Misconceptions about quantifying animal encounter and interaction processes

Abstract

Quantifying animal interactions is crucial for understanding various ecological processes, including social community structures, predator-prey dynamics, spreading of pathogens and information. Despite the ubiquity of interaction processes among animals and the advancements in tracking technologies enabling simultaneous monitoring of multiple individuals, a common theoretical framework to analyse movement data is still lacking. The diverse mechanisms governing how organisms perceive the proximity of others have led to species-specific theoretical approaches, hindering a common currency with which to evaluate and compare findings across taxa. We propose a general framework, borrowing tools from statistical physics, specifically from the theory of reaction diffusion processes. While some of these tools have been employed to predict pathogen transmission events, they have not yet pervaded the movement ecology literature. Using both continuous and discrete variables, we demonstrate the suitability of our framework to study interaction processes. Defining interactions as the transfer of information between individuals, we show that the probability of information transfer for the first time is equivalent to the first-passage probability of reacting in a multi-target environment. As interaction events reduce to encounter events for perfectly efficient information transfer, we compare our formalism to a recent approach that takes the joint occupation probability of two animals over a region of interaction as a measure of the encounter probability, rather than the first-encounter probability. We show the discrepancy between the two approaches by comparing analytically their predictions with continuous variables, while with discrete variables we quantify their difference over time. We conclude by pointing to some of the open problems that reaction diffusion formalism might be able to tackle.