On the Complexity of the Eigenvalue Deletion Problem

Neeldhara Misra; Harshil Mittal; Saket Saurabh; Dhara Thakkar

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2310.00600

On the Complexity of the Eigenvalue Deletion Problem

Neeldhara Misra·Harshil Mittal·Saket Saurabh·Dhara Thakkar

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

For any fixed positive integer $r$ and a given budget $k$, the $r$-\textsc{Eigenvalue Vertex Deletion} ($r$-EVD) problem asks if a graph $G$ admits a subset $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that the adjacency matrix of $G\setminus S$ has at most $r$ distinct eigenvalues. The edge deletion, edge addition, and edge editing variants are defined analogously. For $r = 1$, $r$-EVD is equivalent to the Vertex Cover problem. For $r = 2$, it turns out that $r$-EVD amounts to removing a subset $S$ of at most $k$ vertices so that $G\setminus S$ is a cluster graph where all connected components have the same size. We show that $r$-EVD is NP-complete even on bipartite graphs with maximum degree four for every fixed $r > 2$, and FPT when parameterized by the solution size and the maximum degree of the graph. We also establish several results for the special case when $r = 2$. For the vertex deletion variant, we show that $2$-EVD is NP-complete even on triangle-free and $3d$-regular graphs for any $d\geq 2$, and also NP-complete on $d$-regular graphs for any $d\geq 8$. The edge deletion, addition, and editing variants are all NP-complete for $r = 2$. The edge deletion problem admits a polynomial time algorithm if the input is a cluster graph, while the edge addition variant is hard even when the input is a cluster graph. We show that the edge addition variant has a quadratic kernel. The edge deletion and vertex deletion variants are FPT when parameterized by the solution size alone. Our main contribution is to develop the complexity landscape for the problem of modifying a graph with the aim of reducing the number of distinct eigenvalues in the spectrum of its adjacency matrix. It turns out that this captures, apart from Vertex Cover, also a natural variation of the problem of modifying to a cluster graph as a special case, which we believe may be of independent interest.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Neeldhara Misra, Harshil Mittal, Saket Saurabh, Dhara Thakkar. 2023-10-01. On the Complexity of the Eigenvalue Deletion Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00600

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗