arXiv · 2310.10627
Factored Verification: Detecting and Reducing Hallucination in Summaries of Academic Papers
Abstract
Hallucination plagues even frontier LLMs--but how bad is it really for summarizing academic papers? We evaluate Factored Verification, a simple automated method for detecting hallucinations in abstractive summaries. This method sets a new SotA on hallucination detection in the summarization task of the HaluEval benchmark, achieving 76.2% accuracy. We then use this method to estimate how often language models hallucinate when summarizing across multiple academic papers and find 0.62 hallucinations in the average ChatGPT (16k) summary, 0.84 for GPT-4, and 1.55 for Claude 2. We ask models to self-correct using Factored Critiques and find that this lowers the number of hallucinations to 0.49 for ChatGPT, 0.46 for GPT-4, and 0.95 for Claude 2. The hallucinations we find are often subtle, so we advise caution when using models to synthesize academic papers.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Charlie George, Andreas Stuhlmüller. 2023-10-16. Factored Verification: Detecting and Reducing Hallucination in Summaries of Academic Papers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10627
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.