For how many iterations should we run Markov chain Monte Carlo?

Charles C. Margossian; Andrew Gelman

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2311.02726

For how many iterations should we run Markov chain Monte Carlo?

Charles C. Margossian·Andrew Gelman

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Standard Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) admits three fundamental control parameters: the number of chains, the length of the warmup phase, and the length of the sampling phase. These control parameters play a large role in determining the amount of computation we deploy. In practice, we need to walk a line between achieving sufficient precision and not wasting precious computational resources and time. We review general strategies to check the length of the warmup and sampling phases, and examine the three control parameters of MCMC in the contexts of CPU- and GPU-based hardware. Our discussion centers around three tasks: (1) inference about a latent variable, (2) computation of expectation values and quantiles, and (3) diagnostics to check the reliability of the estimators. This chapter begins with general recommendations on the control parameters of MCMC, which have been battle-tested over the years and often motivate defaults in Bayesian statistical software. Usually we do not know ahead of time how a sampler will interact with a target distribution, and so the choice of MCMC algorithm and its control parameters, tend to be based on experience, re-evaluated after simulations have been obtained and analyzed. The second part of this chapter provides a theoretical motivation for our recommended approach, with pointers to some concerns and open problems. We also examine recent developments on the algorithmic and hardware fronts, which motivate new computational approaches to MCMC.

Explore related subjects

stat.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Charles C. Margossian, Andrew Gelman. 2023-11-05. For how many iterations should we run Markov chain Monte Carlo?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02726

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Extended One-Liners for the Gamma, Poisson, and Binomial Distributions

We demonstrate explicit transformations of three independent uniforms with exact Gamma$(a,1)$, $a>0$, Poisson$(\lambda)$, $\lambda>0$, and Binomial$(N,p)$, $N\geq 1$, $0\leq p \leq 1$ laws using only elementary operations.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2026

Estimating Hierarchically Rank Structured Covariance Matrices

We consider the problem of estimating a high-dimensional covariance matrix from a very limited number of samples. This problem is ubiquitous in computational fluid dynamics, where a small number of fluid snapshots must be used to construct a Gramian matrix determining a reduced-order model, as well as in computational geoscience, where a small ensemble of Earth system forecasts must be used to estimate the covariance matrix associated with the forecast uncertainty. It is common practice to regularize the small-sample covariance by imposing a "localization" structure that enforces a physically realistic correlation length scale, imposing a sparsity constraint, "shrinking" towards a prescribed target, or attenuating small correlations. We propose an alternate technique that regularizes the small-sample covariance by imposing hierarchical rank structure. Compared to regularization methods that assume sparsity such as spatial localization, hierarchical rank structure accommodates a wider range of covariance matrices, roughly corresponding to situations where long-range correlations vary more smoothly than short-range ones. It also results in a data-sparse matrix format that permits highly efficient matrix-vector products. We present theory and algorithms which show how to efficiently estimate a high-dimensional, hierarchically rank structured covariance matrix from limited samples. Through an error analysis and numerical experiments with a variety of model problems, we demonstrate that these techniques are effective at reducing sampling errors, and that in many cases they achieve smaller estimation error than conventional techniques.

stat.CO↗

arXiv2026

Optimal Slice-Adaptive Tuning of Hybrid Slice Sampling

Slice sampling is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm that draws its next state uniformly from a "slice"---a super-level set of the target density function---at each iteration, thereby providing automatic local adaptivity to the scale of the target. In practice the exact slice is not known, so general-purpose implementations use an approximate slice that is grown from a starting interval of length $w>0$, with a computational cost that depends on $w$. This work presents an analysis of the average per-iteration number of target density evaluations, as a function of $w$, of hybrid slice sampling with various slice-finding schemes for targets with contiguous slices. The paper uses the results of the analysis to develop automated, slice-adaptive tuning schemes along with suboptimality bounds and asymptotic convergence guarantees. Simulations demonstrate that the tuning schemes reliably yield near-optimal slice-adaptive tuning with essentially no dependence on the initial setting of $w$.

stat.CO↗