SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.10290

Scalable Algorithms for Laplacian Pseudo-inverse Computation

Abstract

The pseudo-inverse of a graph Laplacian matrix, denoted as $L^\dagger$, finds extensive application in various graph analysis tasks. Notable examples include the calculation of electrical closeness centrality, determination of Kemeny's constant, and evaluation of resistance distance. However, existing algorithms for computing $L^\dagger$ are often computationally expensive when dealing with large graphs. To overcome this challenge, we propose novel solutions for approximating $L^\dagger$ by establishing a connection with the inverse of a Laplacian submatrix $L_v$. This submatrix is obtained by removing the $v$-th row and column from the original Laplacian matrix $L$. The key advantage of this connection is that $L_v^{-1}$ exhibits various interesting combinatorial interpretations. We present two innovative interpretations of $L_v^{-1}$ based on spanning trees and loop-erased random walks, which allow us to develop efficient sampling algorithms. Building upon these new theoretical insights, we propose two novel algorithms for efficiently approximating both electrical closeness centrality and Kemeny's constant. We extensively evaluate the performance of our algorithms on five real-life datasets. The results demonstrate that our novel approaches significantly outperform the state-of-the-art methods by several orders of magnitude in terms of both running time and estimation errors for these two graph analysis tasks. To further illustrate the effectiveness of electrical closeness centrality and Kemeny's constant, we present two case studies that showcase the practical applications of these metrics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meihao Liao, Rong-Hua Li, Qiangqiang Dai, Hongyang Chen, Guoren Wang. 2023-11-17. Scalable Algorithms for Laplacian Pseudo-inverse Computation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.10290

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS