Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2311.14566

Multi-tap Resistive Sensing and FEM Modeling enables Shape and Force Estimation in Soft Robots

Sizhe Tian·Barnabas Gavin Cangan·Stefan Escaida Navarro·Artem Beger·Christian Duriez·Robert K. Katzschmann
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We address the challenge of reliable and accurate proprioception in soft robots, specifically those with tight packaging constraints and relying only on internally embedded sensors. While various sensing approaches with single sensors have been tried, often with a constant curvature assumption, we look into sensing local deformations at multiple locations of the sensor. In our approach, we multi-tap an off-the-shelf resistive sensor by creating multiple electrical connections onto the resistive layer of the sensor and we insert the sensor into a soft body. This modification allows us to measure changes in resistance at multiple segments throughout the length of the sensor, providing improved resolution of local deformations in the soft body. These measurements inform a model based on a finite element method (FEM) that estimates the shape of the soft body and the magnitude of an external force acting at a known arbitrary location. Our model-based approach estimates soft body deformation with approximately 3% average relative error while taking into account internal fluidic actuation. Our estimate of external force disturbance has an 11% relative error within a range of 0 to 5 N. The combined sensing and modeling approach can be integrated, for instance, into soft manipulation platforms to enable features such as identifying the shape and material properties of an object being grasped. Such manipulators can benefit from the inherent softness and compliance while being fully proprioceptive, relying only on embedded sensing and not on external systems such as motion capture. Such proprioception is essential for the deployment of soft robots in real-world scenarios.

Explore related subjects

cs.RO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Sizhe Tian, Barnabas Gavin Cangan, Stefan Escaida Navarro, Artem Beger, Christian Duriez, Robert K. Katzschmann. 2023-11-24. Multi-tap Resistive Sensing and FEM Modeling enables Shape and Force Estimation in Soft Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14566

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO↗
arXiv2026

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO↗