SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2311.18145

Sparsifying generalized linear models

Abstract

We consider the sparsification of sums $F : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}$ where $F(x) = f_1(\langle a_1,x\rangle) + \cdots + f_m(\langle a_m,x\rangle)$ for vectors $a_1,\ldots,a_m \in \mathbb{R}^n$ and functions $f_1,\ldots,f_m : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}_+$. We show that $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate sparsifiers of $F$ with support size $\frac{n}{\varepsilon^2} (\log \frac{n}{\varepsilon})^{O(1)}$ exist whenever the functions $f_1,\ldots,f_m$ are symmetric, monotone, and satisfy natural growth bounds. Additionally, we give efficient algorithms to compute such a sparsifier assuming each $f_i$ can be evaluated efficiently. Our results generalize the classic case of $\ell_p$ sparsification, where $f_i(z) = |z|^p$, for $p \in (0, 2]$, and give the first near-linear size sparsifiers in the well-studied setting of the Huber loss function and its generalizations, e.g., $f_i(z) = \min\{|z|^p, |z|^2\}$ for $0 < p \leq 2$. Our sparsification algorithm can be applied to give near-optimal reductions for optimizing a variety of generalized linear models including $\ell_p$ regression for $p \in (1, 2]$ to high accuracy, via solving $(\log n)^{O(1)}$ sparse regression instances with $m \le n(\log n)^{O(1)}$, plus runtime proportional to the number of nonzero entries in the vectors $a_1, \dots, a_m$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Arun Jambulapati, James R. Lee, Yang P. Liu, Aaron Sidford. 2023-11-29. Sparsifying generalized linear models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18145

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS