arXiv · 2312.11049
Brodsky et al's defence does not work
Abstract
In their defence of "maximum conformality" methods, Brodsky et al make the astonishing claim that any RG transformation a'=a(1+V_1 a + ...) in QCD must have V_1 proportional to b=(33-2n_f)/6. It is well known that this is not true. I emphasize again the correctness and central importance of the Celmaster-Gonsalves relation for the prescription dependence of the Lambda parameter.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P. M. Stevenson. 2023-12-18. Brodsky et al's defence does not work. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11049
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.