SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.07076

Are there "small cardinal models" of a Banach space, whose dual space is in Stegall`s class, but it is not $weak^{*}$-fragmentable, or large cardinals are a must?

Abstract

It is well-known that if $Y$ is a Banach space the $weak^{*}$-fragmentability of its dual space by some metric $\rho$ implies that $Y^{*}$ belongs to the Stegall class -- the former for shortly $\mathcal{W^*}F$, being the latter $\mathcal{S}$ and hence $Y$ is weak Asplund -- call it $\mathcal{WA}$ . It has been proved by O. Kalenda and Kunen that existence of a measurable cardinal implies (it is consistent) that, for instance in the construction of Kalenda Compacts - this space is in the Stegall`s class iff both inclusions of classes are strictly proper. The same authors made following question, is there a model of ZFC, in which the inclusion of $\mathcal{WA}$ in $\mathcal{S}$ actually is equality. Obviously, because of their result the existence of large cardinals ( supercompacts, strongly-compacts, strong cardinals, huge cardinals, Vop\v{e}nka principle) would be a models of the proper inclusion of the above - mentioned classes, being with more consistency power even, see Thomas Jech [TJ03] and Saharon Shelah [SSH17].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Svilen Popov. 2024-01-13. Are there "small cardinal models" of a Banach space, whose dual space is in Stegall`s class, but it is not $weak^{*}$-fragmentable, or large cardinals are a must?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07076

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO