SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2401.07300

Multi-Physics Model Bias Correction with Data-Driven Reduced Order Modelling Techniques: Application to Nuclear Case Studies

Abstract

Nowadays, interest in combining mathematical knowledge about phenomena and data from the physical system is growing. Past research was devoted to developing so-called high-fidelity models, intending to make them able to catch most of the physical phenomena occurring in the system. Nevertheless, models will always be affected by uncertainties related, for example, to the parameters and inevitably limited by the underlying simplifying hypotheses on, for example, geometry and mathematical equations; thus, in a way, there exists an upper threshold of model performance. Now, research in many engineering sectors also focuses on the so-called data-driven modelling, which aims at extracting information from available data to combine it with the mathematical model. Focusing on the nuclear field, interest in this approach is also related to the Multi-Physics modelling of nuclear reactors. Due to the multiple physics involved and their mutual and complex interactions, developing accurate and stable models both from the physical and numerical point of view remains a challenging task despite the advancements in computational hardware and software, and combining the available mathematical model with data can further improve the performance and the accuracy of the former. This work investigates this aspect by applying two Data-Driven Reduced Order Modelling (DDROM) techniques, the Generalised Empirical Interpolation Method and the Parametrised-Background Data-Weak formulation, to literature benchmark nuclear case studies. The main goal of this work is to assess the possibility of using data to perform model bias correction, that is, verifying the reliability of DDROM approaches in improving the model performance and accuracy through the information provided by the data. The obtained numerical results are promising, foreseeing further investigation of the DDROM approach to nuclear industrial cases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Stefano Riva, Carolina Introini, Antonio Cammi. 2024-01-14. Multi-Physics Model Bias Correction with Data-Driven Reduced Order Modelling Techniques: Application to Nuclear Case Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2024.06.040

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Stress-divergence, Laplacian, and rotational forms of the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations with variable viscosity

In the Navier--Stokes equations, incompressibility allows rewriting the viscous term in various forms leading to distinct numerical properties and flow descriptions. Furthermore, models accounting for non-Newtonian, thermal or turbulent effects often break the constant-viscosity assumption, thereby producing additional consistency terms. In this context, the present work compares the classical symmetric-gradient diffusion term with more recent variable-viscosity generalizations of the Laplacian and rotational forms. We discuss, analyze and test their differences with respect to implementation, efficiency, numerical stability and outflow boundary conditions. With a focus on time-dependent flows, we consider second-order implicit-explicit (IMEX) temporal discretizations aimed at improving efficiency and numerical stability. Through a rigorous stability analysis, we show how selected explicit treatments can bypass algorithmic nonlinearities without inducing CFL conditions. Our numerical results highlight important differences between the three viscous formulations---especially in the presence of outflow boundaries, for which the generalized Laplacian form proves more suitable in diffusion-dominated regimes. %(as widely known for constant viscosity).

math.NA

Full-window branch discovery and loss-selected EnKF continuation for data assimilation

We develop a framework for offline full-window branch discovery, optionally followed by online continuation with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF). Three mechanisms drive the branch search: adjoint path-kernel (APK) differentiation balances kernel differentiation and correction-stabilized path perturbation, shifting the optimization from exploration to exploitation; an optimized Gaussian initial law broadens the search over initial-state basins; and loss-weighted mixing across independent runs recombines successful path components. We may then select an interior state using a local loss and continue online with an EnKF. In 40-dimensional Lorenz-96 experiments, the mean offline path RMSE of APK is 4.3 times smaller than that of population weak-$\mathrm{4D\text{-}Var}_x$. The resulting APK-EnKF method has a mean online RMSE 64 times smaller than that of ordinary EnKF.

math.NA

A variational physics-informed graph neural network for heterogeneous solid mechanics

Stress localization in heterogeneous solids is governed by the bimaterial interface, where the displacement field remains $C^0$-continuous, while in-plane stresses jump due to the stiffness mismatch. Coordinate-based physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent this jump via a prescribed regularization width or a weighted interface penalty, making their accuracy sensitive to how phase-contrast changes are handled. This work presents a variational, label-free physics-informed graph neural network (PI-GNN) in which the heterogeneity is carried by the discretization rather than by the trial field. The solver operates on a conforming adaptive mesh graph, assigns constitutive behavior per element, and minimizes the discrete total potential energy as a single unweighted objective in which only first derivatives appear. The discrete energy on piecewise-linear elements coincides with the finite element (FE) Ritz functional. Dirichlet conditions are enforced by construction, with no penalty term, no interface weight, and no prescribed transition width. Using one fixed architecture, optimizer, and loss across small-strain elasticity and finite-strain Neo-Hookean hyperelasticity in two and three dimensions, the von Mises error remains below $3.58\%$ across a stiffness-contrast sweep spanning $(E_{\mathrm{inc}}/E_{\mathrm{mat}}\in[10^{-2},10^{2}])$, where a strong-form PINN degrades to $5.58\%$, and its displacement error reaches $7.66\%$ against $0.49\%$ for the PI-GNN. A trained network halves the ($\sigma_{xx}$) error of an energy-based PINN ($5.01\%$ versus $10.94\%$). Training cost exceeds a single FE solve by more than an order of magnitude, so the construction is a variationally consistent, penalty-free interface representation for parametric surrogates and inverse identification rather than a replacement for a one-off FE analysis.

math.NA