Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2401.10648

Area Modeling using Stay Information for Large-Scale Users and Analysis for Influence of COVID-19

Kazuyuki Shoji·Shunsuke Aoki·Takuro Yonezawa·Nobuo Kawaguchi
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Understanding how people use area in a city can be a valuable information in a wide range of fields, from marketing to urban planning. Area usage is subject to change over time due to various events including seasonal shifts and pandemics. Before the spread of smartphones, this data had been collected through questionnaire survey. However, this is not a sustainable approach in terms of time to results and cost. There are many existing studies on area modeling, which characterize an area with some kind of information, using Point of Interest (POI) or inter-area movement data. However, since POI is data that is statically tied to space, and inter-area movement data ignores the behavior of people within an area, existing methods are not sufficient in terms of capturing area usage changes. In this paper, we propose a novel area modeling method named Area2Vec, inspired by Word2Vec, which models areas based on people's location data. This method is based on the discovery that it is possible to characterize an area based on its usage by using people's stay information in the area. And it is a novel method that can reflect the dynamically changing people's behavior in an area in the modeling results. We validated Area2vec by performing a functional classification of areas in a district of Japan. The results show that Area2Vec can be usable in general area analysis. We also investigated area usage changes due to COVID-19 in two districts in Japan. We could find that COVID-19 made people refrain from unnecessary going out, such as visiting entertainment areas.

Explore related subjects

cs.LG

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kazuyuki Shoji, Shunsuke Aoki, Takuro Yonezawa, Nobuo Kawaguchi. 2024-01-19. Area Modeling using Stay Information for Large-Scale Users and Analysis for Influence of COVID-19. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.10648

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗