SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2403.16474

Sweeping Arrangements of Non-Piercing Curves in Plane

Abstract

Let $\Gamma$ be an arrangement of Jordan curves in the plane, i.e., simple closed curves in the plane. For any curve $\gamma \in \Gamma$, we denote the bounded region enclosed by $\gamma$ as $\tilde{\gamma}$. We say that $\Gamma$ is non-piercing if for any two curves $\alpha , \beta \in \Gamma$, $\tilde{\alpha} \,\setminus\, \tilde{\beta}$ is connected. A non-piercing arrangement of curves generalizes a set of $2$-intersecting curves in which each pair of curves intersect in at most two points. Snoeyink and Hershberger (``Sweeping Arrangements of Curves'', SoCG '89) proved that if we are given an arrangement $\Gamma$ of $2$-intersecting curves and a {\em sweep} curve $\gamma\in{\Gamma}$, then the arrangement can be \emph{swept} by $\gamma$ while always maintaining the $2$-intersecting property of the curves in $\Gamma$. We generalize the result of Snoeyink and Hershberger to the setting of non-piercing arrangements. Given an arrangement $\Gamma$ of non-piercing curves, a sweep curve $\gamma\in \Gamma$, and a point $P$ in $\tilde{\gamma}$, we show that we can continuously shrink $\gamma$ to $P$ so that throughout the process, the arrangement remains non-piercing (except at a finite set of points in time where $\gamma$ crosses other curves), and $P$ lies in $\tilde{\gamma}$. We show that our arguments can be modified if $P$ lies outside $\tilde{\gamma}$, and we want to sweep $\gamma$ \emph{outwards} so that $P$ lies outside $\tilde{\gamma}$, and the arrangement remains non-piercing. As a second contribution, we give an alternate proof of the result of Snoeyink and Hershberger, and give several applications of our results to combinatorial and algorithmic questions including to the \emph{multi-hitting set} problem involving points and non-piercing regions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Suryendu Dalal, Rahul Gangopadhyay, Rajiv Raman, Saurabh Ray. 2024-03-25. Sweeping Arrangements of Non-Piercing Curves in Plane. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16474

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG