arXiv · 2404.17810
A Comparison of Differential Performance Metrics for the Evaluation of Automatic Speaker Verification Fairness
Abstract
When decisions are made and when personal data is treated by automated processes, there is an expectation of fairness -- that members of different demographic groups receive equitable treatment. This expectation applies to biometric systems such as automatic speaker verification (ASV). We present a comparison of three candidate fairness metrics and extend previous work performed for face recognition, by examining differential performance across a range of different ASV operating points. Results show that the Gini Aggregation Rate for Biometric Equitability (GARBE) is the only one which meets three functional fairness measure criteria. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation of the fairness and verification performance of five state-of-the-art ASV systems is also presented. Our findings reveal a nuanced trade-off between fairness and verification accuracy underscoring the complex interplay between system design, demographic inclusiveness, and verification reliability.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Oubaida Chouchane, Christoph Busch, Chiara Galdi, Nicholas Evans, Massimiliano Todisco. 2024-04-27. A Comparison of Differential Performance Metrics for the Evaluation of Automatic Speaker Verification Fairness. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17810
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.