SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2405.14149

A Direct Importance Sampling-based Framework for Rare Event Uncertainty Quantification in Non-Gaussian Spaces

Abstract

This work introduces a novel framework for precisely and efficiently estimating rare event probabilities in complex, high-dimensional non-Gaussian spaces, building on our foundational Approximate Sampling Target with Post-processing Adjustment (ASTPA) approach. An unnormalized sampling target is first constructed and sampled, relaxing the optimal importance sampling distribution and appropriately designed for non-Gaussian spaces. Post-sampling, its normalizing constant is estimated using a stable inverse importance sampling procedure, employing an importance sampling density based on the already available samples. The sought probability is then computed based on the estimates evaluated in these two stages. The proposed estimator is theoretically analyzed, proving its unbiasedness and deriving its analytical coefficient of variation. To sample the constructed target, we resort to our developed Quasi-Newton mass preconditioned Hamiltonian MCMC (QNp-HMCMC) and we prove that it converges to the correct stationary target distribution. To avoid the challenging task of tuning the trajectory length in complex spaces, QNp-HMCMC is effectively utilized in this work with a single-step integration. We thus show the equivalence of QNp-HMCMC with single-step implementation to a unique and efficient preconditioned Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA). An optimization approach is also leveraged to initiate QNp-HMCMC effectively, and the implementation of the developed framework in bounded spaces is eventually discussed. A series of diverse problems involving high dimensionality (several hundred inputs), strong nonlinearity, and non-Gaussianity is presented, showcasing the capabilities and efficiency of the suggested framework and demonstrating its advantages compared to relevant state-of-the-art sampling methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Elsayed Eshra, Konstantinos G. Papakonstantinou, Hamed Nikbakht. 2024-05-23. A Direct Importance Sampling-based Framework for Rare Event Uncertainty Quantification in Non-Gaussian Spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14149

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME