arXiv · 2406.12402
Flee the Flaw: Annotating the Underlying Logic of Fallacious Arguments Through Templates and Slot-filling
Abstract
Prior research in computational argumentation has mainly focused on scoring the quality of arguments, with less attention on explicating logical errors. In this work, we introduce four sets of explainable templates for common informal logical fallacies designed to explicate a fallacy's implicit logic. Using our templates, we conduct an annotation study on top of 400 fallacious arguments taken from LOGIC dataset and achieve a high agreement score (Krippendorf's alpha of 0.54) and reasonable coverage (0.83). Finally, we conduct an experiment for detecting the structure of fallacies and discover that state-of-the-art language models struggle with detecting fallacy templates (0.47 accuracy). To facilitate research on fallacies, we make our dataset and guidelines publicly available.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Irfan Robbani, Paul Reisert, Naoya Inoue, Surawat Pothong, Camélia Guerraoui, Wenzhi Wang, Shoichi Naito, Jungmin Choi, Kentaro Inui. 2024-06-18. Flee the Flaw: Annotating the Underlying Logic of Fallacious Arguments Through Templates and Slot-filling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12402
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.