arXiv · 2406.15130
Assessing Good, Bad and Ugly Arguments Generated by ChatGPT: a New Dataset, its Methodology and Associated Tasks
Abstract
The recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked concerns about their potential to spread misinformation. As a result, there is a pressing need for tools to identify ``fake arguments'' generated by such models. To create these tools, examples of texts generated by LLMs are needed. This paper introduces a methodology to obtain good, bad and ugly arguments from argumentative essays produced by ChatGPT, OpenAI's LLM. We then describe a novel dataset containing a set of diverse arguments, ArGPT. We assess the effectiveness of our dataset and establish baselines for several argumentation-related tasks. Finally, we show that the artificially generated data relates well to human argumentation and thus is useful as a tool to train and test systems for the defined tasks.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Victor Hugo Nascimento Rocha, Igor Cataneo Silveira, Paulo Pirozelli, Denis Deratani Mauá, Fabio Gagliardi Cozman. 2024-06-21. Assessing Good, Bad and Ugly Arguments Generated by ChatGPT: a New Dataset, its Methodology and Associated Tasks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49008-8_34
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.