SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2408.03610

Longest Common Extensions with Wildcards: Trade-off and Applications

Abstract

We study the Longest Common Extension (LCE) problem in a string containing wildcards. Wildcards (also called "don't cares" or "holes") are special characters that match any other character in the alphabet, similar to the character "?" in Unix commands or "." in regular expression engines. We consider the problem parametrized by $G$, the number of maximal contiguous groups of wildcards in the input string. Our main contribution is a simple data structure for this problem that can be built in $O(n (G/t) \log n)$ time, occupies $O(nG/t)$ space, and answers queries in $O(t)$ time, for any $t \in [1, G]$. Up to the $O(\log n)$ factor, this interpolates smoothly between the data structure of Crochemore et al. [JDA 2015], which has $O(nG)$ preprocessing time and space, and $O(1)$ query time, and a simple solution based on the "kangaroo jumping" technique [Landau and Vishkin, STOC 1986], which has $O(n)$ preprocessing time and space, and $O(G)$ query time. By establishing a connection between this problem and Boolean matrix multiplication, we show that our solution is optimal, up to subpolynomial factors, among combinatorial data structures when $G = \Omega(n^\epsilon)$ under a widely believed hypothesis. In addition, we develop a simple deterministic combinatorial algorithm for sparse Boolean matrix multiplication. We further establish a conditional lower bound for non-combinatorial data structures, stating that $O(nG/t^4)$ preprocessing time (resp. space) is optimal, up to subpolynomial factors, for any data structure with query time $t$ for a wide range of $t$ and $G$, assuming the well-established $\textsf{3SUM}$ (resp. $\textsf{Set-Disjointness}$) conjecture. Finally, we show that our data structure can be used to obtain efficient algorithms for approximate pattern matching and structural analysis of strings with wildcards.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gabriel Bathie, Itai Boneh, Panagiotis Charalampopoulos, Jonas Ellert, Tatiana Starikovskaya. 2024-08-07. Longest Common Extensions with Wildcards: Trade-off and Applications. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03610

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS