arXiv · 2409.09302
Heterogeneous Roles against Assignment Based Policies in Two vs Two Target Defense Game
Abstract
In this paper, we consider a target defense game in which the attacker team seeks to reach a high-value target while the defender team seeks to prevent that by capturing them away from the target. To address the curse of dimensionality, a popular approach to solve such team-vs-team game is to decompose it into a set of one-vs-one games. Such an approximation assumes independence between teammates assigned to different one-vs-one games, ignoring the possibility of a richer set of cooperative behaviors, ultimately leading to suboptimality. In this paper, we provide teammate-aware strategies for the attacker team and show that they can outperform the assignment-based strategy, if the defenders still employ an assignment-based strategy. More specifically, the attacker strategy involves heterogeneous roles where one attacker actively intercepts a defender to help its teammate reach the target. We provide sufficient conditions under which such a strategy benefits the attackers, and we validate the results using numerical simulations.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Goutam Das, Violetta Rostobaya, James Berneburg, Zachary I. Bell, Michael Dorothy, Daigo Shishika. 2024-09-14. Heterogeneous Roles against Assignment Based Policies in Two vs Two Target Defense Game. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.09302
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.