SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2409.17509

BioZero: Privacy-Preserving and Publicly Verifiable On-Chain Biometric Authentication via Homomorphic Commitments and Zero-Knowledge Proofs

Abstract

Decentralized identity systems promise user-controlled identifiers and cross-domain verification without a shared identity provider, yet authentication still reduces to possession of keys or credentials once secrets are leaked, reused, or replayed. We present BioZero, a privacy-preserving biometric authentication protocol for decentralized identity that binds an enrolled identity to a biometric witness without revealing biometric templates, while enabling publicly verifiable on-chain decisions. BioZero combines Pedersen commitment-homomorphic computation, consistency spot-checks, and Groth16 zero-knowledge proofs to achieve identity-bound authentication with succinct on-chain verification. We analyze acceptance soundness, freshness, template privacy, and non-malleability under an open decentralized threat model including replay, timing, brute-force, oracle, and forgery attacks. On an Ethereum testbed, BioZero achieves up to 67.8x lower network-adjusted total authentication latency and up to 266.4x faster client-side proving than a zk-SNARK-only baseline. Verification stays in the millisecond range (28.8-41.2 ms vs. 35.4-77.6 ms). With lambda=1 spot-checking, gas grows from 336,778 to 954,066 as N increases from 2 to 128, becomes lower than the baseline from N>=16, and is 2.59x lower at N=128. LFW experiments on 128D and 512D models show accuracy loss below 1% across practical quantization ranges. These results indicate that BioZero is a practical authentication layer for decentralized biometric identity systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Zibin Lin, Taotao Wang, Junhao Lai, Shengli Zhang, Qing Yang, Soung Chang Liew. 2024-09-26. BioZero: Privacy-Preserving and Publicly Verifiable On-Chain Biometric Authentication via Homomorphic Commitments and Zero-Knowledge Proofs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.17509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR