Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2410.09965

A Fully-dynamic Approximation Algorithm for Maximum Weight b-Matchings in Graphs

Fabian Brandt-Tumescheit·Frieda Gerharz·Henning Meyerhenke
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Matching nodes in a graph G = (V, E) is a well-studied algorithmic problem with many applications. The b-matching problem is a generalizati on that allows to match a node with up to b neighbors. This allows more flexible connectivity patterns whenever vertices may have multiple associations. The algorithm b-suitor [Khan et al., SISC2016] is able to compute a (1/2)-approximation of a maximum weight b-matching in O(|E|) time. Since real-world graphs often change over time, fast dynamic methods for b-matching optimization are desirable. In this work, we propose Dyn-b-suitor, a dynamic algorithm for the weighted b-matching problem. As a non-trivial extension to the dynamic Suitor algorithm for 1-matchings [Angriman et al., JEA 2022], our approach computes (1/2)-approximate b-matchings by identifying and updating affected vertices without static recomputation. Our proposed algorithm is fully-dynamic, i. e., it supports both edge insertions and deletions, and we prove that it computes the same solution as its static counterpart. In extensive experiments on real-world benchmark graphs and generated instances, our dynamic algorithm yields significant savings compared to the sequential b-suitor, e. g., for batch updates with $10^3$ edges with an average acceleration factor of $10^3$. When comparing our sequential dynamic algorithm with the parallel (static) b-suitor on a 128-core machine, our dynamic algorithm is still $59$x to $10^4$ faster.

Explore related subjects

cs.DScs.SI

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Fabian Brandt-Tumescheit, Frieda Gerharz, Henning Meyerhenke. 2024-10-13. A Fully-dynamic Approximation Algorithm for Maximum Weight b-Matchings in Graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09965

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗