arXiv · 2410.10135
FormalAlign: Automated Alignment Evaluation for Autoformalization
Abstract
Autoformalization aims to convert informal mathematical proofs into machine-verifiable formats, bridging the gap between natural and formal languages. However, ensuring semantic alignment between the informal and formalized statements remains challenging. Existing approaches heavily rely on manual verification, hindering scalability. To address this, we introduce \textsc{FormalAlign}, the first automated framework designed for evaluating the alignment between natural and formal languages in autoformalization. \textsc{FormalAlign} trains on both the autoformalization sequence generation task and the representational alignment between input and output, employing a dual loss that combines a pair of mutually enhancing autoformalization and alignment tasks. Evaluated across four benchmarks augmented by our proposed misalignment strategies, \textsc{FormalAlign} demonstrates superior performance. In our experiments, \textsc{FormalAlign} outperforms GPT-4, achieving an Alignment-Selection Score 11.58\% higher on \forml-Basic (99.21\% vs. 88.91\%) and 3.19\% higher on MiniF2F-Valid (66.39\% vs. 64.34\%). This effective alignment evaluation significantly reduces the need for manual verification. Both the dataset and code can be accessed via~\url{https://github.com/rookie-joe/FormalAlign}.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jianqiao Lu, Yingjia Wan, Yinya Huang, Jing Xiong, Zhengying Liu, Zhijiang Guo. 2024-10-14. FormalAlign: Automated Alignment Evaluation for Autoformalization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10135
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.