SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2410.18272

Partially Identified Rankings from Pairwise Interactions

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of ranking objects based on their latent merits using data from pairwise interactions. We allow for incomplete observation of these interactions and study what can be inferred about rankings in such settings. First, we show that identification of the ranking depends on a trade-off between the tournament graph and the interaction function: in parametric models, such as the Bradley-Terry-Luce, rankings are point identified even with sparse graphs, whereas nonparametric models require dense graphs. Second, moving beyond point identification, we characterize the identified set in the nonparametric model under any tournament structure and represent it through moment inequalities. Finally, we propose a likelihood-based statistic to test whether a ranking belongs to the identified set. We study two testing procedures: one is finite-sample valid but computationally intensive; the other is easy to implement and valid asymptotically. We illustrate our results using Brazilian employer-employee data to study how workers rank firms when moving across jobs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Federico Crippa, Danil Fedchenko. 2024-10-23. Partially Identified Rankings from Pairwise Interactions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18272

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM