Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2411.19394

Hashing for Sampling-Based Estimation

Anders Aamand·Ioana O. Bercea·Jakob Bæk Tejs Houen·Jonas Klausen·Mikkel Thorup
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Hash-based sampling and estimation are common themes in computing. Using hashing for sampling gives us the coordination needed to compare samples from different sets. Hashing is also used when we want to count distinct elements. The quality of the estimator for, say, the Jaccard similarity between two sets, depends on the concentration of the number of sampled elements from their intersection. Often we want to compare one query set against many stored sets to find one of the most similar sets, so we need strong concentration and low error-probability. In this paper, we provide strong explicit concentration bounds for Tornado Tabulation hashing [Bercea, Beretta, Klausen, Houen, and Thorup, FOCS'23] which is a realistic constant time hashing scheme. Previous concentration bounds for fast hashing were off by orders of magnitude, in the sample size needed to guarantee the same concentration. The true power of our result appears when applied in the local uniformity framework by [Dahlgaard, Knudsen, Rotenberg, and Thorup, STOC'15].

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Anders Aamand, Ioana O. Bercea, Jakob Bæk Tejs Houen, Jonas Klausen, Mikkel Thorup. 2024-11-28. Hashing for Sampling-Based Estimation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.19394

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗