arXiv subjects

Anders Aamand

Publications and source records attributed to Anders Aamand.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Online Geometric Packing through Online TSP Scheduling

We consider the problem of online packing of convex polygons into a strip by translations. While online algorithms with a constant competitive ratio have been known for rectangles for decades [Baker and Schwarz, SICOMP 1983], the current best algorithm for convex polygons has competitive ratio $O(n^{\log_2 3-1}\log n) = O(n^{0.59})$, where $n$ is the number of polygons. This algorithm was described by Aamand, Abrahamsen, Beretta, and Kleist [SODA 2023], who also proved a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$ on the competitive ratio of any algorithm. Their lower bound is obtained via a reduction from \emph{online sorting}, a problem introduced in the same paper, for which they established a lower bound on the competitive ratio. We introduce a new, natural online problem that we call online TSP scheduling. Here, points $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ arrive online from a metric space $(M,d)$, and upon arrival each $x_i$ must be assigned a visit time $p_i\in[0,\infty)$ satisfying $|p_i-p_j|\ge d(x_i,x_j)$ for all $j<i$. The cost of the schedule is $\max_i p_i$. We present an $O(\log^2 n)$-competitive algorithm for online TSP scheduling, and show how this implies an $O(\log^2 n)$-competitive algorithm for online translational strip packing of convex polygons. We also prove that the same competitive ratio is achievable for other translational packing problems, including online packing of $d$-dimensional unit hyperdisks in $\mathbb R^{d+1}$, whose offline version was studied by Alt, Cabello, Cheong, Park, and Seiferth [Comp. Geom. 2026]. Our algorithm for online TSP scheduling builds on a recent breakthrough for online sorting by Azar, Panigrahi, and Vardi [SODA 2026]. We thus show that the connection between packing and online sorting can be used not only for lower bounds, but also for algorithms.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

How fast can you find a good hypothesis?

In the hypothesis selection problem, we are given sample and query access to finite set of candidate distributions (hypotheses), $\mathcal{H} = \{H_1, \ldots, H_n\}$, and samples from an unknown distribution $P$, both over a domain $\mathcal{X}$. The goal is to output a distribution $Q$ whose distance to $P$ is comparable to that of the nearest hypothesis in $\mathcal{H}$. Specifically, if the minimum distance is $\mathsf{OPT}$, we aim to output $Q$ such that, with probability at least $1-δ$, its total variation distance to $P$ is at most $C \cdot \mathsf{OPT} + \varepsilon$. The optimal approximation for proper algorithms (where $Q \in \mathcal{H}$) is $C=3$ using $Θ(\log(n/δ)/\varepsilon^2)$ samples from $P$ and for improper algorithms (where $Q$ is not necessarily in $\mathcal{H}$) is $C=2$ using $\tildeΘ(\log(n/δ)/\varepsilon^2)$ samples from $P$. In the improper setting, the algorithm achieving $C=2$ [Bousquet, Braverman, Kol, Efremenko, Moran, FOCS 2021] runs in time which grows polynomially with $|\mathcal{X}|$ -- it does not run in finite time for real-valued distributions. A promising path towards improved runtime is to consider improper algorithms which output a mixture $Q$ of the hypotheses as such a distribution can be represented in $n$ words of memory. We show (1) a lower bound that no algorithm which outputs a mixture can achieve approximation better than $C = 3-2/n$ unless the number of samples is polynomial in $|\mathcal{X}|$, as well as (2) an algorithm which runs in time $\text{poly}(n)$ and achieves the same approximation guarantee. In the proper setting, [Aliakbarpour, Bun, Smith, NeurIPS 2024] provided an algorithm with $C=3$ running in $\tilde{O}(n/(δ^3\varepsilon^3))$ time. We improve this time complexity to $\tilde{O}(n/(δ\varepsilon^2))$, significantly reducing the dependence on the confidence and error parameters.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Covering and Partitioning Complex Objects with Small Pieces

We study the problems of covering or partitioning a polygon $P$ (possibly with holes) using a minimum number of small pieces, where a small piece is a connected sub-polygon contained in an axis-aligned unit square. For covering, we seek to write $P$ as a union of small pieces, and in partitioning, we furthermore require the pieces to be pairwise interior-disjoint. We show that these problems are in fact equivalent: Optimum covers and partitions have the same number of pieces. For covering, a natural local search algorithm repeatedly attempts to replace $k$ pieces from a candidate cover with $k-1$ pieces. In two dimensions and for sufficiently large $k$, we show that when no such swap is possible, the cover is a $1+O(1/\sqrt k)$-approximation, hence obtaining the first PTAS for the problem. Prior to our work, the only known algorithm was a $13$-approximation that only works for polygons without holes [Abrahamsen and Rasmussen, SODA 2025]. In contrast, in the three dimensional version of the problem, for a polyhedron $P$ of complexity $n$, we show that it is NP-hard to approximate an optimal cover or partition to within a factor that is logarithmic in $n$, even if $P$ is simple, i.e., has genus $0$ and no holes.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2026

Skirting Additive Error Barriers for Private Turnstile Streams

We study differentially private continual release of the number of distinct items in a turnstile stream, where items may be both inserted and deleted. A recent work of Jain, Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, Sivakumar, and Smith (NeurIPS '23) shows that for streams of length $T$, polynomial additive error of $Ω(T^{1/4})$ is necessary, even without any space restrictions. We show that this additive error lower bound can be circumvented if the algorithm is allowed to output estimates with both additive \emph{and multiplicative} error. We give an algorithm for the continual release of the number of distinct elements with $\text{polylog} (T)$ multiplicative and $\text{polylog}(T)$ additive error. We also show a qualitatively similar phenomenon for estimating the $F_2$ moment of a turnstile stream, where we can obtain $1+o(1)$ multiplicative and $\text{polylog} (T)$ additive error. Both results can be achieved using polylogarithmic space whereas prior approaches use polynomial space. In the sublinear space regime, some multiplicative error is necessary even if privacy is not a consideration. We raise several open questions aimed at better understanding trade-offs between multiplicative and additive error in private continual release.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Differentially Private Quantiles with Smaller Error

In the approximate quantiles problem, the goal is to output $m$ quantile estimates, the ranks of which are as close as possible to $m$ given quantiles $0 \leq q_1 \leq\dots \leq q_m \leq 1$. We present a mechanism for approximate quantiles that satisfies $\varepsilon$-differential privacy for a dataset of $n$ real numbers where the ratio between the distance between the closest pair of points and the size of the domain is bounded by $ψ$. As long as the minimum gap between quantiles is sufficiently large, $|q_i-q_{i-1}|\geq Ω\left(\frac{m\log(m)\log(ψ)}{n\varepsilon}\right)$ for all $i$, the maximum rank error of our mechanism is $O\left(\frac{\log(ψ) + \log^2(m)}{\varepsilon}\right)$ with high probability. Previously, the best known algorithm under pure DP was due to Kaplan, Schnapp, and Stemmer~(ICML '22), who achieved a bound of $O\left(\frac{\log(ψ)\log^2(m) + \log^3(m)}{\varepsilon}\right)$. Our improvement stems from the use of continual counting techniques which allows the quantiles to be randomized in a correlated manner. We also present an $(\varepsilon,δ)$-differentially private mechanism that relaxes the gap assumption without affecting the error bound, improving on existing methods when $δ$ is sufficiently close to zero. We provide experimental evaluation which confirms that our mechanism performs favorably compared to prior work in practice, in particular when the number of quantiles $m$ is large.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

On the Structure of Replicable Hypothesis Testers

A hypothesis testing algorithm is replicable if, when run on two different samples from the same distribution, it produces the same output with high probability. This notion, defined by by Impagliazzo, Lei, Pitassi, and Sorell [STOC'22], can increase trust in testing procedures and is deeply related to algorithmic stability, generalization, and privacy. We build general tools to prove lower and upper bounds on the sample complexity of replicable testers, unifying and quantitatively improving upon existing results. We identify a set of canonical properties, and prove that any replicable testing algorithm can be modified to satisfy these properties without worsening accuracy or sample complexity. A canonical replicable algorithm computes a deterministic function of its input (i.e., a test statistic) and thresholds against a uniformly random value in $[0,1]$. It is invariant to the order in which the samples are received, and, if the testing problem is ``symmetric,'' then the algorithm is also invariant to the labeling of the domain elements, resolving an open question by Liu and Ye [NeurIPS'24]. We prove new lower bounds for uniformity, identity, and closeness testing by reducing to the case where the replicable algorithm satisfies these canonical properties. We systematize and improve upon a common strategy for replicable algorithm design based on test statistics with known expectation and bounded variance. Our framework allow testers which have been extensively analyzed in the non-replicable setting to be made replicable with minimal overhead. As direct applications of our framework, we obtain constant-factor optimal bounds for coin testing and closeness testing and get replicability for free in a large parameter regime for uniformity testing. We also give state-of-the-art bounds for replicable Gaussian mean testing, and, unlike prior work, our algorithm runs in polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Breaking the $n^{1.5}$ Additive Error Barrier for Private and Efficient Graph Sparsification via Private Expander Decomposition

We study differentially private algorithms for graph cut sparsification, a fundamental problem in algorithms, privacy, and machine learning. While significant progress has been made, the best-known private and efficient cut sparsifiers on $n$-node graphs approximate each cut within $\widetilde{O}(n^{1.5})$ additive error and $1+γ$ multiplicative error for any $γ> 0$ [Gupta, Roth, Ullman TCC'12]. In contrast, "inefficient" algorithms, i.e., those requiring exponential time, can achieve an $\widetilde{O}(n)$ additive error and $1+γ$ multiplicative error [Eli{á}{š}, Kapralov, Kulkarni, Lee SODA'20]. In this work, we break the $n^{1.5}$ additive error barrier for private and efficient cut sparsification. We present an $(\varepsilon,δ)$-DP polynomial time algorithm that, given a non-negative weighted graph, outputs a private synthetic graph approximating all cuts with multiplicative error $1+γ$ and additive error $n^{1.25 + o(1)}$ (ignoring dependencies on $\varepsilon, δ, γ$). At the heart of our approach lies a private algorithm for expander decomposition, a popular and powerful technique in (non-private) graph algorithms.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Improved Approximations for Hard Graph Problems using Predictions

We design improved approximation algorithms for NP-hard graph problems by incorporating predictions (e.g., learned from past data). Our prediction model builds upon and extends the $\varepsilon$-prediction framework by Cohen-Addad, d'Orsi, Gupta, Lee, and Panigrahi (NeurIPS 2024). We consider an edge-based version of this model, where each edge provides two bits of information, corresponding to predictions about whether each of its endpoints belong to an optimal solution. Even with weak predictions where each bit is only $\varepsilon$-correlated with the true solution, this information allows us to break approximation barriers in the standard setting. We develop algorithms with improved approximation ratios for MaxCut, Vertex Cover, Set Cover, and Maximum Independent Set problems (among others). Across these problems, our algorithms share a unifying theme, where we separately satisfy constraints related to high degree vertices (using predictions) and low-degree vertices (without using predictions) and carefully combine the answers.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Learning-Augmented Frequent Directions

An influential paper of Hsu et al. (ICLR'19) introduced the study of learning-augmented streaming algorithms in the context of frequency estimation. A fundamental problem in the streaming literature, the goal of frequency estimation is to approximate the number of occurrences of items appearing in a long stream of data using only a small amount of memory. Hsu et al. develop a natural framework to combine the worst-case guarantees of popular solutions such as CountMin and CountSketch with learned predictions of high frequency elements. They demonstrate that learning the underlying structure of data can be used to yield better streaming algorithms, both in theory and practice. We simplify and generalize past work on learning-augmented frequency estimation. Our first contribution is a learning-augmented variant of the Misra-Gries algorithm which improves upon the error of learned CountMin and learned CountSketch and achieves the state-of-the-art performance of randomized algorithms (Aamand et al., NeurIPS'23) with a simpler, deterministic algorithm. Our second contribution is to adapt learning-augmentation to a high-dimensional generalization of frequency estimation corresponding to finding important directions (top singular vectors) of a matrix given its rows one-by-one in a stream. We analyze a learning-augmented variant of the Frequent Directions algorithm, extending the theoretical and empirical understanding of learned predictions to matrix streaming.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2025

Lightweight Protocols for Distributed Private Quantile Estimation

Distributed data analysis is a large and growing field driven by a massive proliferation of user devices, and by privacy concerns surrounding the centralised storage of data. We consider two \emph{adaptive} algorithms for estimating one quantile (e.g.~the median) when each user holds a single data point lying in a domain $[B]$ that can be queried once through a private mechanism; one under local differential privacy (LDP) and another for shuffle differential privacy (shuffle-DP). In the adaptive setting we present an $\varepsilon$-LDP algorithm which can estimate any quantile within error $α$ only requiring $O(\frac{\log B}{\varepsilon^2α^2})$ users, and an $(\varepsilon,δ)$-shuffle DP algorithm requiring only $\widetilde{O}((\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2}+\frac{1}{α^2})\log B)$ users. Prior (nonadaptive) algorithms require more users by several logarithmic factors in $B$. We further provide a matching lower bound for adaptive protocols, showing that our LDP algorithm is optimal in the low-$\varepsilon$ regime. Additionally, we establish lower bounds against non-adaptive protocols which paired with our understanding of the adaptive case, proves a fundamental separation between these models.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

Hashing for Sampling-Based Estimation

Hash-based sampling and estimation are common themes in computing. Using hashing for sampling gives us the coordination needed to compare samples from different sets. Hashing is also used when we want to count distinct elements. The quality of the estimator for, say, the Jaccard similarity between two sets, depends on the concentration of the number of sampled elements from their intersection. Often we want to compare one query set against many stored sets to find one of the most similar sets, so we need strong concentration and low error-probability. In this paper, we provide strong explicit concentration bounds for Tornado Tabulation hashing [Bercea, Beretta, Klausen, Houen, and Thorup, FOCS'23] which is a realistic constant time hashing scheme. Previous concentration bounds for fast hashing were off by orders of magnitude, in the sample size needed to guarantee the same concentration. The true power of our result appears when applied in the local uniformity framework by [Dahlgaard, Knudsen, Rotenberg, and Thorup, STOC'15].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Near-Optimal Trace Reconstruction for Mildly Separated Strings

In the trace reconstruction problem our goal is to learn an unknown string $x\in \{0,1\}^n$ given independent traces of $x$. A trace is obtained by independently deleting each bit of $x$ with some probability $δ$ and concatenating the remaining bits. It is a major open question whether the trace reconstruction problem can be solved with a polynomial number of traces when the deletion probability $δ$ is constant. The best known upper bound and lower bounds are respectively $\exp(\tilde O(n^{1/5}))$ and $\tilde Ω(n^{3/2})$ both by Chase [Cha21b,Cha21a]. Our main result is that if the string $x$ is mildly separated, meaning that the number of zeros between any two ones in $x$ is at least polylog$n$, and if $δ$ is a sufficiently small constant, then the trace reconstruction problem can be solved with $O(n \log n)$ traces and in polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Statistical-Computational Trade-offs for Density Estimation

We study the density estimation problem defined as follows: given $k$ distributions $p_1, \ldots, p_k$ over a discrete domain $[n]$, as well as a collection of samples chosen from a ``query'' distribution $q$ over $[n]$, output $p_i$ that is ``close'' to $q$. Recently~\cite{aamand2023data} gave the first and only known result that achieves sublinear bounds in {\em both} the sampling complexity and the query time while preserving polynomial data structure space. However, their improvement over linear samples and time is only by subpolynomial factors. Our main result is a lower bound showing that, for a broad class of data structures, their bounds cannot be significantly improved. In particular, if an algorithm uses $O(n/\log^c k)$ samples for some constant $c>0$ and polynomial space, then the query time of the data structure must be at least $k^{1-O(1)/\log \log k}$, i.e., close to linear in the number of distributions $k$. This is a novel \emph{statistical-computational} trade-off for density estimation, demonstrating that any data structure must use close to a linear number of samples or take close to linear query time. The lower bound holds even in the realizable case where $q=p_i$ for some $i$, and when the distributions are flat (specifically, all distributions are uniform over half of the domain $[n]$). We also give a simple data structure for our lower bound instance with asymptotically matching upper bounds. Experiments show that the data structure is quite efficient in practice.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Differentially Private Gomory-Hu Trees

Given an undirected, weighted $n$-vertex graph $G = (V, E, w)$, a Gomory-Hu tree $T$ is a weighted tree on $V$ such that for any pair of distinct vertices $s, t \in V$, the Min-$s$-$t$-Cut on $T$ is also a Min-$s$-$t$-Cut on $G$. Computing a Gomory-Hu tree is a well-studied problem in graph algorithms and has received considerable attention. In particular, a long line of work recently culminated in constructing a Gomory-Hu tree in almost linear time [Abboud, Li, Panigrahi and Saranurak, FOCS 2023]. We design a differentially private (DP) algorithm that computes an approximate Gomory-Hu tree. Our algorithm is $\varepsilon$-DP, runs in polynomial time, and can be used to compute $s$-$t$ cuts that are $\tilde{O}(n/\varepsilon)$-additive approximations of the Min-$s$-$t$-Cuts in $G$ for all distinct $s, t \in V$ with high probability. Our error bound is essentially optimal, as [Dalirrooyfard, Mitrović and Nevmyvaka, NeurIPS 2023] showed that privately outputting a single Min-$s$-$t$-Cut requires $Ω(n)$ additive error even with $(1, 0.1)$-DP and allowing for a multiplicative error term. Prior to our work, the best additive error bounds for approximate all-pairs Min-$s$-$t$-Cuts were $O(n^{3/2}/\varepsilon)$ for $\varepsilon$-DP [Gupta, Roth and Ullman, TCC 2012] and $O(\sqrt{mn} \cdot \text{polylog}(n/δ) / \varepsilon)$ for $(\varepsilon, δ)$-DP [Liu, Upadhyay and Zou, SODA 2024], both of which are implied by differential private algorithms that preserve all cuts in the graph. An important technical ingredient of our main result is an $\varepsilon$-DP algorithm for computing minimum Isolating Cuts with $\tilde{O}(n / \varepsilon)$ additive error, which may be of independent interest.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Online Sorting and Translational Packing of Convex Polygons

We investigate several online packing problems in which convex polygons arrive one by one and have to be placed irrevocably into a container, while the aim is to minimize the used space. Among other variants, we consider strip packing and bin packing, where the container is the infinite horizontal strip $[0,\infty)\times [0,1]$ or a collection of $1 \times 1$ bins, respectively. We draw interesting connections to the following online sorting problem OnlineSorting$[γ,n]$: We receive a stream of real numbers $s_1,\ldots,s_n$, $s_i\in[0,1]$, one by one. Each real must be placed in an array $A$ with $γn$ initially empty cells without knowing the subsequent reals. The goal is to minimize the sum of differences of consecutive reals in $A$. The offline optimum is to place the reals in sorted order so the cost is at most $1$. We show that for any $Δ$-competitive online algorithm of OnlineSorting$[γ,n]$, it holds that $γΔ\inΩ(\log n/\log \log n)$. We use this lower bound to prove the non-existence of competitive algorithms for various online translational packing problems of convex polygons, among them strip packing, bin packing and perimeter packing. This also implies that there exists no online algorithm that can pack all streams of pieces of diameter and total area at most $δ$ into the unit square. These results are in contrast to the case when the pieces are restricted to rectangles, for which competitive algorithms are known. Likewise, the offline versions of packing convex polygons have constant factor approximation algorithms. As a complement, we also include algorithms for both online sorting and translation-only online strip packing with non-trivial competitive ratios. Our algorithm for strip packing relies on a new technique for recursively subdividing the strip into parallelograms of varying height, thickness and slope.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2023

Improved Frequency Estimation Algorithms with and without Predictions

Estimating frequencies of elements appearing in a data stream is a key task in large-scale data analysis. Popular sketching approaches to this problem (e.g., CountMin and CountSketch) come with worst-case guarantees that probabilistically bound the error of the estimated frequencies for any possible input. The work of Hsu et al. (2019) introduced the idea of using machine learning to tailor sketching algorithms to the specific data distribution they are being run on. In particular, their learning-augmented frequency estimation algorithm uses a learned heavy-hitter oracle which predicts which elements will appear many times in the stream. We give a novel algorithm, which in some parameter regimes, already theoretically outperforms the learning based algorithm of Hsu et al. without the use of any predictions. Augmenting our algorithm with heavy-hitter predictions further reduces the error and improves upon the state of the art. Empirically, our algorithms achieve superior performance in all experiments compared to prior approaches.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Constant Approximation for Individual Preference Stable Clustering

Individual preference (IP) stability, introduced by Ahmadi et al. (ICML 2022), is a natural clustering objective inspired by stability and fairness constraints. A clustering is $α$-IP stable if the average distance of every data point to its own cluster is at most $α$ times the average distance to any other cluster. Unfortunately, determining if a dataset admits a $1$-IP stable clustering is NP-Hard. Moreover, before this work, it was unknown if an $o(n)$-IP stable clustering always \emph{exists}, as the prior state of the art only guaranteed an $O(n)$-IP stable clustering. We close this gap in understanding and show that an $O(1)$-IP stable clustering always exists for general metrics, and we give an efficient algorithm which outputs such a clustering. We also introduce generalizations of IP stability beyond average distance and give efficient, near-optimal algorithms in the cases where we consider the maximum and minimum distances within and between clusters.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Data Structures for Density Estimation

We study statistical/computational tradeoffs for the following density estimation problem: given $k$ distributions $v_1, \ldots, v_k$ over a discrete domain of size $n$, and sampling access to a distribution $p$, identify $v_i$ that is "close" to $p$. Our main result is the first data structure that, given a sublinear (in $n$) number of samples from $p$, identifies $v_i$ in time sublinear in $k$. We also give an improved version of the algorithm of Acharya et al. (2018) that reports $v_i$ in time linear in $k$. The experimental evaluation of the latter algorithm shows that it achieves a significant reduction in the number of operations needed to achieve a given accuracy compared to prior work.

cs.DS↗