Testing vs Estimation for Index-Invariant Properties in the Huge Object Model

Sourav Chakraborty; Eldar Fischer; Arijit Ghosh; Amit Levi; Gopinath Mishra; Sayantan Sen

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2412.02235

Testing vs Estimation for Index-Invariant Properties in the Huge Object Model

Sourav Chakraborty·Eldar Fischer·Arijit Ghosh·Amit Levi·Gopinath Mishra·Sayantan Sen

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Huge Object model of property testing [Goldreich and Ron, TheoretiCS 23] concerns properties of distributions supported on $\{0,1\}^n$, where $n$ is so large that even reading a single sampled string is unrealistic. Instead, query access is provided to the samples, and the efficiency of the algorithm is measured by the total number of queries that were made to them. Index-invariant properties under this model were defined in [Chakraborty et al., COLT 23], as a compromise between enduring the full intricacies of string testing when considering unconstrained properties, and giving up completely on the string structure when considering label-invariant properties. Index-invariant properties are those that are invariant through a consistent reordering of the bits of the involved strings. Here we provide an adaptation of Szemer\'edi's regularity method for this setting, and in particular show that if an index-invariant property admits an $\epsilon$-test with a number of queries depending only on the proximity parameter $\epsilon$, then it also admits a distance estimation algorithm whose number of queries depends only on the approximation parameter.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Sourav Chakraborty, Eldar Fischer, Arijit Ghosh, Amit Levi, Gopinath Mishra, Sayantan Sen. 2024-12-03. Testing vs Estimation for Index-Invariant Properties in the Huge Object Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02235

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗