SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2412.20573

The intrinsic motivation of reinforcement and imitation learning for sequential tasks

Abstract

This work in the field of developmental cognitive robotics aims to devise a new domain bridging between reinforcement learning and imitation learning, with a model of the intrinsic motivation for learning agents to learn with guidance from tutors multiple tasks, including sequential tasks. The main contribution has been to propose a common formulation of intrinsic motivation based on empirical progress for a learning agent to choose automatically its learning curriculum by actively choosing its learning strategy for simple or sequential tasks: which task to learn, between autonomous exploration or imitation learning, between low-level actions or task decomposition, between several tutors. The originality is to design a learner that benefits not only passively from data provided by tutors, but to actively choose when to request tutoring and what and whom to ask. The learner is thus more robust to the quality of the tutoring and learns faster with fewer demonstrations. We developed the framework of socially guided intrinsic motivation with machine learning algorithms to learn multiple tasks by taking advantage of the generalisability properties of human demonstrations in a passive manner or in an active manner through requests of demonstrations from the best tutor for simple and composing subtasks. The latter relies on a representation of subtask composition proposed for a construction process, which should be refined by representations used for observational processes of analysing human movements and activities of daily living. With the outlook of a language-like communication with the tutor, we investigated the emergence of a symbolic representation of the continuous sensorimotor space and of tasks using intrinsic motivation. We proposed within the reinforcement learning framework, a reward function for interacting with tutors for automatic curriculum learning in multi-task learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sao Mai Nguyen. 2024-12-29. The intrinsic motivation of reinforcement and imitation learning for sequential tasks. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.20573

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decoupling Readiness from Release for Tail-Aware Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workflows

Agentic LLM workflows consist of sequences of model turns interleaved with tool interactions, so their end-to-end completion time depends not only on inference speed but also on when ready turns are released. Most runtimes release each turn immediately upon readiness. Under contention, this eager release policy can accumulate released but unfinished work; once submitted, those turns can no longer be reordered by the workflow-level policy, increasing tail latency. We present a tail-risk-aware turn release scheduling method that jointly decides which ready turn to release next and how much released but unfinished work to maintain. The method uses a mean--Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) objective to capture the evolving tail risk of unfinished workflows, incorporates online estimates of turn work when prioritizing ready turns, and adapts the released work budget to observed queue pressure. We evaluate the method using real agent execution traces from software engineering tasks across multiple LLMs and workflow arrival rates. The method performs comparably to eager release under light load and substantially reduces the P95 of workflow flow time under contention, achieving up to a \(3.50\times\) speedup.

cs.AI

Demystifying the Privacy-Utility Trade-off in LLM Interactions

The integration of Large Language Models into daily tasks relies on context-rich instructions, inevitably exposing sensitive user information. Current privacy-preserving methods typically employ context-agnostic static rules, causing severe utility degradation. However, the specific mechanisms governing how sanitization impacts downstream performance remain largely underexplored. To address this, we conduct a systematic analysis to deconstruct the privacy-utility trade-off, uncovering three underlying mechanisms: (1) Context-Dependent Utility, which first establishes when to sanitize by revealing that data value shifts from critical constraints to dispensable noise based on user intent; (2) Strategic Adaptation, which subsequently determines how to sanitize by dictating that the choice between removal and replacement depends on the task's reliance on factual integrity versus structural coherence; and (3) Combinatorial Interplay, which finally extends the protection scope by demonstrating that attributes form a semantic web of synergistic dependencies or antagonistic redundancies. Guided by these insights, we introduce an intent-driven local protection framework. By distilling a lightweight model Veilmind-4B to drive a dynamic extraction-sanitization-restoration pipeline, our approach reaches a low-leakage privacy point while preserving substantially higher response utility than existing privacy-oriented baselines, advancing the privacy-utility trade-off toward the Pareto frontier.

cs.AI

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.

cs.AI