arXiv · 2501.04789
Comparison of fundamental frequency estimators with subharmonic voice signals
Abstract
In clinical voice signal analysis, mishandling of subharmonic voicing may cause an acoustic parameter to signal false negatives. As such, the ability of a fundamental frequency estimator to identify speaking fundamental frequency is critical. This paper presents a sustained-vowel study, which used a quality-of-estimate classification to identify subharmonic errors and subharmonics-to-harmonics ratio (SHR) to measure the strength of subharmonic voicing. Five estimators were studied with a sustained vowel dataset: Praat, YAAPT, Harvest, CREPE, and FCN-F0. FCN-F0, a deep-learning model, performed the best both in overall accuracy and in correctly resolving subharmonic signals. CREPE and Harvest are also highly capable estimators for sustained vowel analysis.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Takeshi Ikuma, Melda Kunduk, Andrew J. McWhorter. 2025-01-08. Comparison of fundamental frequency estimators with subharmonic voice signals. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.04789
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.