SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2501.10930

An Online Algorithm for Bayesian Variable Selection in Logistic Regression Models With Streaming Data

Abstract

In several modern applications, data are generated continuously over time, such as data generated from smartwatches. We assume data are collected and analyzed sequentially, in batches. Since traditional or offline methods can be extremely slow, Ghosh et al. (2025) proposed an online method for Bayesian model averaging (BMA). Inspired by the literature on renewable estimation, they developed an online Bayesian method for generalized linear models (GLMs) that reduces storage and computational demands dramatically compared to traditional methods for BMA. The method of Ghosh et al. (2025) works very well when the number of models is small. It can also work reasonably well in moderately large model spaces. For the latter case, the method relies on a screening stage to identify important models in the first several batches via offline methods. Thereafter, the model space remains fixed in all subsequent batches. In the post-screening stage, online updates are made to the model specific parameters, for models selected in the screening stage. For high-dimensional model spaces, the chance of missing important models in the screening stage is more likely. This necessitates the development of a method, which permits the model space to be updated as new batches of data arrive. In this article, we develop an online Bayesian model selection method for logistic regression, where the selected model can potentially change throughout the data collection process. We use simulation studies to show that our new method can outperform the method of Ghosh et al. (2025). Furthermore, we describe scenarios under which the gain from our new method is expected to be small. We revisit the traffic crash data analyzed by Ghosh et al. (2025) and illustrate that our new model selection method can have better performance for variable selection.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Payel Ghosal, Shamriddha De, Joyee Ghosh. 2025-01-19. An Online Algorithm for Bayesian Variable Selection in Logistic Regression Models With Streaming Data. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10930

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME