Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.15270

Inductive Biases for Zero-shot Systematic Generalization in Language-informed Reinforcement Learning

Negin Hashemi Dijujin·Seyed Roozbeh Razavi Rohani·Mohammad Mahdi Samiei·Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Sample efficiency and systematic generalization are two long-standing challenges in reinforcement learning. Previous studies have shown that involving natural language along with other observation modalities can improve generalization and sample efficiency due to its compositional and open-ended nature. However, to transfer these properties of language to the decision-making process, it is necessary to establish a proper language grounding mechanism. One approach to this problem is applying inductive biases to extract fine-grained and informative representations from the observations, which makes them more connectable to the language units. We provide architecture-level inductive biases for modularity and sparsity mainly based on Neural Production Systems (NPS). Alongside NPS, we assign a central role to memory in our architecture. It can be seen as a high-level information aggregator which feeds policy/value heads with comprehensive information and simultaneously guides selective attention in NPS through attentional feedback. Our results in the BabyAI environment suggest that the proposed model's systematic generalization and sample efficiency are improved significantly compared to previous models. An extensive ablation study on variants of the proposed method is conducted, and the effectiveness of each employed technique on generalization, sample efficiency, and training stability is specified.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Negin Hashemi Dijujin, Seyed Roozbeh Razavi Rohani, Mohammad Mahdi Samiei, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah. 2025-01-25. Inductive Biases for Zero-shot Systematic Generalization in Language-informed Reinforcement Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15270

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

Maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) is a standard approach to imbalanced binary classification. Although positive and negative data are required for maximizing the AUC, negative data are often difficult to collect in some real-world applications due to privacy concerns or the need for specialized expertise to annotate them. Thus, AUC maximization from positive and unlabeled (PU) data has been attracting attention. Existing methods assume that labeled positive data are unbiased samples from the true positive distribution. However, this ideal assumption is often violated in practice. In this paper, we propose a method to maximize the AUC from biased PU data. To address the bias, our key idea is to exploit {\it confidence}, i.e., the probability that an instance is positive, associated with the small number of labeled positive data. We derive an estimator of the AUC risk using biased PU data with confidence, enabling AUC maximization under such bias. We further show that the rewritten AUC risk induces a Bayes-optimal AUC ranking even when the available confidence is any strictly increasing transformation of the true posterior probability. We experimentally show the effectiveness of our method on eight real-world datasets.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

Measuring the Value of World-Model Updates: A Counterfactual Utility Protocol for Continual Adaptation

Continual world models must decide whether new data justify changing the model. Fixed replay schedules and prediction-error triggers specify when to update, but neither reveals the value of an individual update: one deployment run cannot show how the same model would have performed at that moment had it held its parameters. We introduce the fork ledger, which branches a deployment stream at pre-registered decision points into matched update and hold continuations under common random numbers. It evaluates both continuations on the same episodes and records $\Delta R = R_{\mathrm{update}} - R_{\mathrm{hold}}$. Always applying one fixed update mechanism lowers return on all three simulated control tasks: CartPole ($-144.0$; checkpoint-bootstrap $95\%$ CI $[-185.4,-116.1]$, against a converged return near $650$), Walker ($-82.8$; $[-101.1,-61.7]$) and Cheetah ($-18.6$; $[-29.0,-6.6]$). Divergence is an outcome of applying the update, so the estimand counts every attempted fork; restricted to the $693$ of $720$ that did not collapse, CartPole and Walker are unchanged in sign ($-113.4$ and $-82.1$) and Cheetah becomes unresolved ($-3.9$; $[-17.5,+13.0]$). The task is the unit of inference: each contributes $240$ attempted forks over five pretrained checkpoints crossed with two drift directions. The ledger makes counterfactual utility observable for a fixed mechanism, allowing triggers to be judged by the updates they select rather than by surprise detection alone.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

When More Is Not Better: Component Anti-Synergy in a P300 Speller

P300 brain-computer interface (BCI) spellers can provide hands-free communication for people with severe motor impairments. Modern pipelines combine multiple individually promising components, often assuming that 'more-is-better'. We tested this assumption using a four-component full-factorial experiment varying the inclusion of Euclidean Alignment (EA), xDAWN spatial filtering, subject calibration, and language model priors on a public P300 dataset. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, repetitions, and information transfer rate (ITR) with mixed-effects models. Results show that the value of components is conditional rather than additive. Calibration was the strongest singular contributor, while EA compensated for its absence in zero-calibration settings. Adding independently useful components could also reduce performance, revealing component anti-synergy. Contrary to conventional wisdom, LM support was not universally beneficial: its effect depends strongly on the strength of the underlying EEG pipeline, while results from a larger LM showed a similar pattern. Together, these findings challenge maximal 'all-on' pipeline design and highlight the value of selecting spatial and language-support components according to the quality of available EEG evidence.

cs.LG↗