Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2501.16042

Degree of freedom count in linear gauge invariant PDE systems

Simon Lyakhovich·Dmitri Piontkovski
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We consider not necessarily Lagrangian partial linear differential equations (PDE) with constant coefficients. Einstein proposed a definition of the"strength" of such a field theory that defines its degree of freedom (DoF). Einsteinian strength is based on the asymptotic number of free Taylor series coefficients of bounded degree in the general solution of the PDE system. The direct count of DoF in this way is a complex and technically demanding process. Proceeding from Einsteinian strength of equations and making use of commutative algebra tools, we deduce another DoF count recipe which is formulated in terms of orders of the field equations, their gauge symmetries and gauge identities. This DoF count recipe covers the case of reducible gauge field theories, and it is easy to use. We begin with interpreting the matrix of the system as a linear map between polynomial modules. First, proceeding from Einsteinian definition, we derive an explicit formula for DoF as the multiplicity of a certain extension module. Second, we prove another explicit formula for DoF in terms of orders of equations and gauge generators. A notable consequence of this formula is that two Hermitian conjugate systems have identical DoF. Every classical field theory defines the BRST complex which has the natural grading known as the ghost number. We equip this complex with another grading, which we call differential order. This grading is 1 for every space time-derivative, while all thefields, ghosts, and antifields are assigned with this degree in a certain way, depending on their ghost number and the orders of equations and gauge generators. We compute the Euler characteristic of the BRST complex with respect to this new grading. This provides homological interpretation of DoF for linear gauge system as minus the residue at infinity of the logarithmic derivative of the Euler characteristics for its BRST complex.

Explore related subjects

math-phhep-thmath.ACmath.APmath.MP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Simon Lyakhovich, Dmitri Piontkovski. 2025-01-27. Degree of freedom count in linear gauge invariant PDE systems. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16042

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Why we should condition denoising diffusion generative models on windows of past observations

Data assimilation (DA) is, traditionally, a cycling process that relies on time-dependent priors to propagate information from past observations to future cycles. Using denoising diffusion generative modeling for DA is challenging because standard approaches use a fixed training data set, which in turn leads to a static prior that ignores information from past observations. Because past observations are ignored, DA systems with static priors lead to larger posterior errors than cycling DA systems. Incorporating time-dependent priors into generative models, however, requires expensive and frequent retraining. Motivated by linear systems theory - where the dependence of a prediction of a Kalman filter on past observations decays exponentially - we condition diffusion models on short windows of past observations. Specifically, we describe training procedures for two frameworks: a diffusion DA system predicting the current state given a set of past observations, and a diffusion ``direct observation prediction'' (DOP) system, predicting future observations given a set of past observations. Using a canonical linear system, we show that both systems can achieve the minimal posterior error characteristic of a fully-cycled DA/DOP system, without re-training, provided the time windows are long enough. The linear setup ensures analytical tractability, avoids confounding neural network training errors, and confirms that conditioning on windows of past observations is required for efficient and accurate diffusion-based DA or DOP.

math-ph↗
arXiv2026

The kinematic structures and the inertial geometry of a moving charge

We ask how much of the geometry a charged particle moves in is fixed by its motion, and how much a particle must bring. We ask of a symplectic structure only that it relate velocity to momentum as Hamilton's equations do, and we ask it of every energy at once. In particular, we show that the structures meeting that demand are the canonical one and its twists by a closed two-form of the base. A field provides the two-form, a particle the multiplier before it, which we identify constitutively with its charge. Thus, a single energy governs a family of structures, and each particle takes the one its charge fixes. We then ask what a particle must bring to be given a momentum, and we show that the degree of that map settles the degree at which a field enters Newton's Second Law. An antisymmetric bilinear form returns no Lorentz force, whilst a Randers metric returns one --- a length whose difference from a Riemannian one is linear in the velocity. Moreover, we find that metric already within the twisted structure, as its primitive over a level of the free energy, and its law of transport to be nonlinear, no affine connection being known to serve. Under an indefinite signature the length parts from the dynamics, and the extremals turn from shortest to longest. On the round sphere a monopole flux leaves no such metric, whilst the transport remains and prequantisation, given a unit of action, restricts the charge to a lattice. In this manner, we conclude that each charge-to-mass ratio receives a geometry of its own, so that by a functionalist criterion none of them is the spacetime of a charged particle.

math-ph↗