Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.00565

Do neonates hear what we measure? Assessing neonatal ward soundscapes at the neonates ears

Bhan Lam·Peijin Esther Monica Fan·Yih Yann Tay·Woei Bing Poon·Zhen-Ting Ong·Kenneth Ooi·Woon-Seng Gan·Shin Yuh Ang
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Acoustic guidelines for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) aim to protect vulnerable neonates from noise-induced physiological harm. However, the lack of recognised international standards for measuring neonatal soundscapes has led to inconsistencies in instrumentation and microphone placement in existing literature, raising concerns about the relevance and effectiveness of these guidelines. This study addresses these gaps through long-term acoustic measurements in an operational NICU and a high-dependency ward. We investigate the influence of microphone positioning, bed placement, and ward layout on the assessment of NICU soundscapes. Beyond traditional A-weighted decibel metrics, this study evaluates C-weighted metrics for low-frequency noise, the occurrence of tonal sounds (e.g., alarms), and transient loud events known to disrupt neonates' sleep. Using linear mixed-effects models with aligned ranks transformation ANOVA (LME-ART-ANOVA), our results reveal significant differences in measured noise levels based on microphone placement, highlighting the importance of capturing sound as perceived directly at the neonate's ears. Additionally, bed position and ward layout significantly impact noise exposure, with a NICU bed position consistently exhibiting the highest sound levels across all (psycho)acoustic metrics. These findings support the adoption of binaural measurements along with the integration of additional (psycho)acoustic metrics, such as tonality and transient event occurrence rates, to reliably characterise the neonatal auditory experience.

Explore related subjects

eess.AScs.SD

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Bhan Lam, Peijin Esther Monica Fan, Yih Yann Tay, Woei Bing Poon, Zhen-Ting Ong, Kenneth Ooi, Woon-Seng Gan, Shin Yuh Ang. 2025-02-01. Do neonates hear what we measure? Assessing neonatal ward soundscapes at the neonates ears. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Diarization Error Decomposition Under Pause Annotation Ambiguity

Speaker diarization evaluation is sensitive to ambiguity in pause annotation, which can inflate diarization error rate (DER) or obscure genuine model errors. We show that morphological closing, which has been used for pause-tolerant diarization evaluation, discards segment-level distinctions. Instead, we propose an exact, overlap-aware decomposition of standard DER into a pause-attributable component, consisting of errors compatible with pause filling, and a residual core component that can serve as a proxy for intrinsic diarization errors. The decomposition leaves DER unchanged, while the pause-attributable and core components vary monotonically with the pause threshold and eventually saturate. Experiments spanning synthetic transformations, annotation mismatch, cross-domain evaluation, and tight-boundary diarization show that the decomposition reveals error sources not apparent from standard DER.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Less can be More: What Aspects of Speech Drive End-of-Turn Detection

In conversational AI, detecting when a speaker has finished talking is crucial for natural turn taking. While recent work incorporates semantics, the relative contribution of different modalities remains unclear. We present a controlled ablation of acoustic, prosodic, and semantic signals for streaming end of turn detection using a lightweight trimodal classifier. Under identical training conditions, the acoustic prosodic combination achieves the best balance of accuracy and latency, achieving utterance F1 of 0.93 with 7.8% false alarms at 400ms median latency. Adding text increases premature detections without improving performance. Feature space analysis confirms that prosodic features have the strongest class separability, while text representations overlap substantially. These findings suggest that turn-taking is primarily conveyed through intonation and silence patterns rather than semantic completeness, enabling faster and more reliable systems without expensive text inference.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Downstream-Task-Aware Unified Source Separation

Task-aware unified source separation (TUSS) enables a single model to handle diverse separation tasks by conditioning on input prompts. However, conventional TUSS does not account for downstream task requirements, such as whether the enhanced speech will be used for human listening or automatic speech recognition (ASR). In this paper, we propose a prompt extension framework for TUSS that incorporates downstream task information into the input prompts and switches the loss function according to the given prompt during training, enabling outputs with different signal characteristics at inference time. Specifically, we introduce an ASR-dedicated prompt paired with a regularized loss function that reduces speech artifacts to improve ASR robustness, while the standard prompt is paired with the conventional SNR loss function. Experiments on the LibriSpeech and JNAS corpora demonstrate that the proposed joint-training scheme enables a single model to improve ASR performance over noisy input across a wide range of SNR conditions by selecting the ASR-dedicated prompt, while maintaining general speech enhancement quality when the standard prompt is used.

eess.AS↗