SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2502.07062

Breaking Barriers: Combinatorial Algorithms for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization with Sublinear Adaptivity and $1/e$ Approximation

Abstract

With the rapid growth of data in modern applications, parallel algorithms for maximizing non-monotone submodular functions have gained significant attention. In the parallel computation setting, the state-of-the-art approximation ratio of $1/e$ is achieved by a continuous algorithm (Ene & Nguyen, 2020) with adaptivity $ O\left(\log(n)\right)$. In this work, we focus on size constraints and present the first combinatorial algorithm matching this bound -- a randomized parallel approach achieving $1/e-\varepsilon$ approximation ratio. This result bridges the gap between continuous and combinatorial approaches for this problem. As a byproduct, we also develop a simpler $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm with high probability ($\ge 1-1/n$). Both algorithms achieve $ O\left(\log(n)\log(k)\right)$ adaptivity and $O\left(n\log(n)\log(k)\right)$ query complexity. Empirical results show our algorithms achieve competitive objective values, with the $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm particularly efficient in queries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Yixin Chen, Wenjing Chen, Alan Kuhnle. 2025-02-10. Breaking Barriers: Combinatorial Algorithms for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization with Sublinear Adaptivity and $1/e$ Approximation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07062

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS