SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2505.05213

Overlapping Biclustering

Abstract

We study the problem of transforming bipartite graphs into bicluster graphs. Abu-Khzam, Isenmann, and Merchad [IWOCA '25] introduced two variants of this problem. In both problems, the goal is to transform a bipartite graph into a bicluster graph with at most $k$ operations, where the allowed operations are inserting an edge, deleting an edge, and splitting a vertex. Splitting a vertex $v$ refers to replacing $v$ by two new vertices whose combined neighborhood equals the neighborhood of $v$. The latter models overlapping clusters, that is, vertices belonging to multiple clusters, and is motivated by several real-world applications. The versions differ in that one variant allows splitting any vertex, while the second variant only allows vertex splits on one side of the bipartition. Regarding computational complexity, they showed APX-hardness for both variants and a polynomial kernel (with $O(k^5)$ vertices) for the one-sided variant. They asked as open problems whether the polynomial kernel can be improved and whether it can also be extended for the other variant. We answer both questions in the affirmative and give kernels with $O(k^2)$ vertices for both variants. We also show that both problems can be solved in $O(k^{11k} + n + m)$ time, where $n$ and $m$ denote the number of vertices and edges in the input graph, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Matthias Bentert, Pål Grønås Drange, Erlend Haugen. 2025-05-08. Overlapping Biclustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS