SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.00708

On the (In)Approximability of the Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set Problem

Abstract

We study the minimum \emph{Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set} (\megset) problem introduced in [Foucaud et al., CALDAM'23]: given a graph $G$, we say that an edge is monitored by a pair $u,v$ of vertices if \emph{all} shortest paths between $u$ and $v$ traverse $e$; the goal of the problem consists in finding a subset $M$ of vertices of $G$ such that each edge of $G$ is monitored by at least one pair of vertices in $M$, and $|M|$ is minimized. In this paper, we prove that all polynomial-time approximation algorithms for the minimum \megset problem must have an approximation ratio of $\Omega(\log n)$, unless \p = \np. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-constant inapproximability result known for this problem. We also strengthen the known \np-hardness of the problem on $2$-apex graphs by showing that the same result holds for $1$-apex graphs. This leaves open the problem of determining whether the problem remains \np-hard on planar (i.e., $0$-apex) graphs. On the positive side, we design an algorithm that computes good approximate solutions for hereditary graph classes that admit efficiently computable balanced separators of truly sublinear size. This immediately results in polynomial-time approximation algorithms achieving an approximation ratio of $O(n^{\frac{1}{4}} \sqrt{\log n})$ on planar graphs, graphs with bounded genus, and $k$-apex graphs with $k=O(n^{\frac{1}{4}})$. On graphs with bounded treewidth, we obtain an approximation ratio of $O(\log^{3/2} n)$ for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$. This compares favorably with the best-known approximation algorithm for general graphs, which achieves an approximation ratio of $O(\sqrt{n \log n})$ via a simple reduction to the \textsc{Set Cover} problem.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Davide Bilò, Giordano Colli, Luca Forlizzi, Stefano Leucci. 2025-07-01. On the (In)Approximability of the Monitoring Edge Geodetic Set Problem. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00708

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS