Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.01366

Faster Algorithm for Second (s,t)-mincut and Breaking Quadratic barrier for Dual Edge Sensitivity for (s,t)-mincut

Surender Baswana·Koustav Bhanja·Anupam Roy
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We study (s,t)-cuts of second minimum capacity and present the following algorithmic and graph-theoretic results. 1. Vazirani and Yannakakis [ICALP 1992] designed the first algorithm for computing an (s,t)-cut of second minimum capacity using $O(n^2)$ maximum (s,t)-flow computations. For directed integer-weighted graphs, we significantly improve this bound by designing an algorithm that computes an $(s,t)$-cut of second minimum capacity using $O(\sqrt{n})$ maximum (s,t)-flow computations w.h.p. To achieve this result, a close relationship of independent interest is established between $(s,t)$-cuts of second minimum capacity and global mincuts in directed weighted graphs. 2. Minimum+1 (s,t)-cuts have been studied quite well recently [Baswana, Bhanja, and Pandey, ICALP 2022], which is a special case of second (s,t)-mincut. (a) For directed multi-graphs, we design an algorithm that, given any maximum (s,t)-flow, computes a minimum+1 (s,t)-cut, if it exists, in $O(m)$ time. (b) The existing structures for storing and characterizing all minimum+1 (s,t)-cuts occupy $O(mn)$ space. For undirected multi-graphs, we design a DAG occupying only $O(m)$ space that stores and characterizes all minimum+1 (s,t)-cuts. 3. The study of minimum+1 (s,t)-cuts often turns out to be useful in designing dual edge sensitivity oracles -- a compact data structure for efficiently reporting an (s,t)-mincut after insertion/failure of any given pair of query edges. It has been shown recently [Bhanja, ICALP 2025] that any dual edge sensitivity oracle for (s,t)-mincut in undirected multi-graphs must occupy ${\Omega}(n^2)$ space in the worst-case, irrespective of the query time. For simple graphs, we break this quadratic barrier while achieving a non-trivial query time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Surender Baswana, Koustav Bhanja, Anupam Roy. 2025-07-02. Faster Algorithm for Second (s,t)-mincut and Breaking Quadratic barrier for Dual Edge Sensitivity for (s,t)-mincut. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.01366

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗