arXiv · 2507.02089
Sample Complexity Bounds for Linear Constrained MDPs with a Generative Model
Abstract
We consider infinite-horizon $\gamma$-discounted (linear) constrained Markov decision processes (CMDPs) where the objective is to find a policy that maximizes the expected cumulative reward subject to expected cumulative constraints. Given access to a generative model, we propose to solve CMDPs with a primal-dual framework that can leverage any black-box unconstrained MDP solver. For linear CMDPs with feature dimension $d$, we instantiate the framework by using mirror descent value iteration (\texttt{MDVI})~\citep{kitamura2023regularization} an example MDP solver. We provide sample complexity bounds for the resulting CMDP algorithm in two cases: (i) relaxed feasibility, where small constraint violations are allowed, and (ii) strict feasibility, where the output policy is required to exactly satisfy the constraint. For (i), we prove that the algorithm can return an $\epsilon$-optimal policy with high probability by using $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^2}{(1-\gamma)^4\epsilon^2}\right)$ samples. For (ii), we show that the algorithm requires $\tilde{O}\left(\frac{d^2}{(1-\gamma)^6\epsilon^2\zeta^2}\right)$ samples, where $\zeta$ is the problem-dependent Slater constant that characterizes the size of the feasible region. Furthermore, we prove a lower-bound of $\Omega\left(\frac{d^2}{(1-\gamma)^5\epsilon^2\zeta^2}\right)$ for the strict feasibility setting. We note that our upper bounds under both settings exhibit a near-optimal dependence on $d$, $\epsilon$, and $\zeta$. Finally, we instantiate our framework for tabular CMDPs and show that it can be used to recover near-optimal sample complexities in this setting.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Xingtu Liu, Lin F. Yang, Sharan Vaswani. 2025-07-02. Sample Complexity Bounds for Linear Constrained MDPs with a Generative Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02089
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.