SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.04948

Node-neighbor subnetworks and Hk-core decomposition

Abstract

The network homology Hk-core decomposition proposed in this article is similar to the k-core decomposition based on node degrees of the network. The C. elegans neural network and the cat cortical network are used as examples to reveal the symmetry of the deep structures of such networks. First, based on the concept of neighborhood in mathematics, some new concepts are introduced, including such as node-neighbor subnetwork and Betti numbers of the neighbor subnetwork, among others. Then, the Betti numbers of the neighbor subnetwork of each node are computed, which are used to perform Hk-core decomposition of the network homology. The construction process is as follows: the initial network is referred to as the H0-core; the H1-core is obtained from the H0-core by deleting some nodes of certain properties; the H2-core is obtained from the H1-core by deleting some nodes or edges of certain properties; the H3-core is obtained from the H2-core by deleting some nodes of certain properties or by retaining the nodes of certain properties, and so on, which will be described in detail in the main text. Throughout the process, the index of node involved in deleting edge needs to be updated in every step. The Hk-core decomposition is easy to implement in parallel. It has a wide range of applications in many fields such as network science, data science, computational topology, and artificial intelligence. In this article, we also show how to use it to simplify homology calculation, e.g. for the C. elegans neural network, whereas the results of decomposition are the H1-core, the H2-core, and the H3-core. Thus, the simplexes consisting of four highest-order cavities in the H3-core subnetwork can also be directly obtained.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dinghua Shi, Yang Zhao, Guanrong Chen. 2025-07-07. Node-neighbor subnetworks and Hk-core decomposition. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04948

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG