SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2507.09178

The BdryMat\'ern GP: Reliable incorporation of boundary information on irregular domains for Gaussian process modeling

Abstract

Gaussian processes (GPs) are broadly used as surrogate models for expensive computer simulators of complex phenomena. However, a key bottleneck is that its training data are generated from this expensive simulator and thus can be highly limited. A promising solution is to supplement the learning model with boundary information from scientific knowledge. However, despite recent work on boundary-integrated GPs, such models largely cannot accommodate boundary information on irregular (i.e., non-hypercube) domains, and do not provide sample path smoothness control or approximation error analysis, both of which are important for reliable surrogate modeling. We thus propose a novel BdryMat\'ern GP modeling framework, which can reliably integrate Dirichlet, Neumann and Robin boundaries on an irregular connected domain with a boundary set that is twice-differentiable almost everywhere. Our model leverages a new BdryMat\'ern covariance kernel derived in path integral form via a stochastic partial differential equation formulation. Similar to the GP with Mat\'ern kernel, we prove that sample paths from the BdryMat\'ern GP satisfy the desired boundaries with smoothness control on its derivatives. We further present an efficient approximation procedure for the BdryMat\'ern kernel using finite element modeling with rigorous error analysis. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the BdryMat\'ern GP in a suite of numerical experiments on incorporating broad boundaries on irregular domains.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Liang Ding, Simon Mak, C. F. Jeff Wu. 2025-07-12. The BdryMat\'ern GP: Reliable incorporation of boundary information on irregular domains for Gaussian process modeling. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09178

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Surprise Reduction and Nullification in Bayesian and Inverse Bayesian Inference under Ambiguous Prediction-Error Attribution

In non-stationary environments, prediction errors may signal environmental change or transient outliers, and adaptive systems must track such changes without overreacting to outliers. We distinguish surprise reduction, which updates beliefs to fit observations, from surprise nullification, which weakens constraints imposed by the predictive structure, and formalize both within Bayesian and inverse Bayesian (BIB) inference. Belief and likelihood updates are derived from variational objectives sharing a nullification strength, determined endogenously by minimizing surprise under the candidate post-update predictive distribution. In the Gaussian case, nullification expands belief and likelihood variances by a common factor relative to standard Bayesian updating, leaving the ratio unchanged. BIB thus defers attribution of the prediction error, committing to neither latent-state change nor observation-process uncertainty. The nullification strength is carried over as a candidate and is maintained or released according to the predictive surprise of the next observation. In a mean estimation task with outliers and changepoints, no scanned parameter setting of a Sage-Husa-type adaptive Kalman filter, fixed-strength BIB variant, or belief-forgetting-only variant outperforms BIB in both changepoint tracking and post-outlier stability. An oracle-informed reduced Bayesian model tracks changepoints better but is less stable after outliers. Although BIB maintains no explicit hypotheses about changepoints or outliers, it generates event-dependent dynamics. The learning rate increases after changepoints, whereas after outliers, nullification is released, and this increase is suppressed. Deferring attribution and letting subsequent observations differentiate the responses may constitute a principle of adaptive inference in non-stationary environments.

stat.ME

Generalized Ridge Refitting for the Lasso and Prediction Improvement Bounds

We study a class of Lasso based estimators obtained by applying a quadratic correction on the Lasso equicorrelation set. The penalty matrix determines both the magnitude and geometry of the correction and contains, among other cases, the isotropic Lasso--Ridge correction, least squares refitting, Gram proportional interpolation between the Lasso and least squares, and coordinate specific penalties. We first derive a closed form representation and isolate the positive gain component of the resulting prediction improvement. We then control the remaining stochastic linear term in expectation by localizing the random signed equicorrelation model around a deterministic reference support. This yields a finite sample expectation bound that explicitly accounts for the randomness induced by Lasso model selection. The resulting decomposition provides a unified framework for understanding when Lasso based quadratic corrections can improve prediction.

stat.ME

Discretization in covariate-adaptive randomization: gains and losses

Covariate-adaptive randomization(CAR) is widely implemented in clinical trials to balance prognostic covariates across treatment arms. Continuous covariates are often discretized into strata in practice, yet their consequences are not clearly understood. This paper provides a comprehensive study of the impact of discretization on both the CAR design process and the inferential results thereafter. We establish the asymptotic properties of both imbalance measures and treatment effect estimators under discretized and non-discretized settings. Practical recommendations are given on when and how discretization should be employed. We show that discretization in design is generally recommended, as it enhances robustness against model misspecification. However, if the true model is known, the most efficient strategy is to balance covariates according to that model in the design. The theoretical results are corroborated by extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to a diabetes trial dataset. Together, the results clarify the gains and losses of discretization in CAR and pave the way for learning impact of discretization to other designs and beyond.

stat.ME