Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.06928

Head-steered channel selection method for hearing aid applications using remote microphones

Vasudha Sathyapriyan·Michael S. Pedersen·Mike Brookes·Jan Østergaard·Patrick A. Naylor·Jesper Jensen
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We propose a channel selection method for hearing aid applications using remote microphones, in the presence of multiple competing talkers. The proposed channel selection method uses the hearing aid user's head-steering direction to identify the remote channel originating from the frontal direction of the hearing aid user, which captures the target talker signal. We pose the channel selection task as a multiple hypothesis testing problem, and derive a maximum likelihood solution. Under realistic, simplifying assumptions, the solution selects the remote channel which has the highest weighted squared absolute correlation coefficient with the output of the head-steered hearing aid beamformer. We analyze the performance of the proposed channel selection method using close-talking remote microphones and table microphone arrays. Through simulations using realistic acoustic scenes, we show that the proposed channel selection method consistently outperforms existing methods in accurately finding the remote channel that captures the target talker signal, in the presence of multiple competing talkers, without the use of any additional sensors.

Explore related subjects

eess.AS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vasudha Sathyapriyan, Michael S. Pedersen, Mike Brookes, Jan Østergaard, Patrick A. Naylor, Jesper Jensen. 2025-08-09. Head-steered channel selection method for hearing aid applications using remote microphones. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3637702

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Diarization Error Decomposition Under Pause Annotation Ambiguity

Speaker diarization evaluation is sensitive to ambiguity in pause annotation, which can inflate diarization error rate (DER) or obscure genuine model errors. We show that morphological closing, which has been used for pause-tolerant diarization evaluation, discards segment-level distinctions. Instead, we propose an exact, overlap-aware decomposition of standard DER into a pause-attributable component, consisting of errors compatible with pause filling, and a residual core component that can serve as a proxy for intrinsic diarization errors. The decomposition leaves DER unchanged, while the pause-attributable and core components vary monotonically with the pause threshold and eventually saturate. Experiments spanning synthetic transformations, annotation mismatch, cross-domain evaluation, and tight-boundary diarization show that the decomposition reveals error sources not apparent from standard DER.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Less can be More: What Aspects of Speech Drive End-of-Turn Detection

In conversational AI, detecting when a speaker has finished talking is crucial for natural turn taking. While recent work incorporates semantics, the relative contribution of different modalities remains unclear. We present a controlled ablation of acoustic, prosodic, and semantic signals for streaming end of turn detection using a lightweight trimodal classifier. Under identical training conditions, the acoustic prosodic combination achieves the best balance of accuracy and latency, achieving utterance F1 of 0.93 with 7.8% false alarms at 400ms median latency. Adding text increases premature detections without improving performance. Feature space analysis confirms that prosodic features have the strongest class separability, while text representations overlap substantially. These findings suggest that turn-taking is primarily conveyed through intonation and silence patterns rather than semantic completeness, enabling faster and more reliable systems without expensive text inference.

eess.AS↗
arXiv2026

Downstream-Task-Aware Unified Source Separation

Task-aware unified source separation (TUSS) enables a single model to handle diverse separation tasks by conditioning on input prompts. However, conventional TUSS does not account for downstream task requirements, such as whether the enhanced speech will be used for human listening or automatic speech recognition (ASR). In this paper, we propose a prompt extension framework for TUSS that incorporates downstream task information into the input prompts and switches the loss function according to the given prompt during training, enabling outputs with different signal characteristics at inference time. Specifically, we introduce an ASR-dedicated prompt paired with a regularized loss function that reduces speech artifacts to improve ASR robustness, while the standard prompt is paired with the conventional SNR loss function. Experiments on the LibriSpeech and JNAS corpora demonstrate that the proposed joint-training scheme enables a single model to improve ASR performance over noisy input across a wide range of SNR conditions by selecting the ASR-dedicated prompt, while maintaining general speech enhancement quality when the standard prompt is used.

eess.AS↗