SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.07509

A Deep-Inference Sequent Calculus for Basic Propositional Team Logic (Without Delving Too Deep)

Abstract

We introduce a sequent calculus for the propositional team logic with both the split disjunction and the inquisitive disjunction consisting of a Gentzen-style system (G3-like) for classical propositional logic together with two deep-inference rules for the inquisitive disjunction. We show that the system satisfies various desirable properties: it admits height-preserving weakening, contraction and inversion; it supports a procedure for constructing cutfree proofs and countermodels similar to that for G3cp; and cut elimination holds as a corollary of cut elimination for the G3-style subsystem together with a normal form theorem for cutfree derivations. We also prove a sequent interpolation theorem for the system that yields a novel Lyndon's interpolation theorem for the logic as a corollary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aleksi Anttila, Rosalie Iemhoff, Fan Yang. 2025-08-10. A Deep-Inference Sequent Calculus for Basic Propositional Team Logic (Without Delving Too Deep). https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

There is no maximal $K$-degree

The Kolmogorov complexity of a string characterize how complex it is to describe the string. If every prefix of a real $x$ is more complex to describe than every prefix (of the same length) of real $y$, then it is seen as $x$ is more complex to describe than $y$. It is wondered if there is a real $x$ so that no other reals are strictly more complex (to describe) than $x$. The behavior of Kolmogorov complexity functions generated by reals (namely $n\mapsto$ the minimal description length of the real) is quite chaos. Therefore, it is widely believed that there are many reals that are maximally complex to describe. For instance, it is conjectured that all random enough reals have maximal $K$-degree. In this paper, it is shown that there is no real with maximal $K$-degree. Actually, for almost all real $x$, we can uniformly computably find another real whose $K$-degree is strictly above $x$.

math.LO

Quadruples and cubes

We prove, in $\mathsf{ZFC}$, that the $\lambda$-terraced cube relation fails whenever $\lambda$ is an uncountable cardinal. The corresponding terraced relation for quadruples fails for every $\lambda$. If $\lambda$ is $\aleph_0$ then the pretinent terraced relation has consistency strength of at least one Woodin cardinal. We prove positive polarized relations at a successor and a double successor from wondrous ideals. We show, however, that there are no such ideals over two consecutive cardinals simultaneously.

math.LO

Possibilistic Logic over a Logic of Formal Inconsistency

In this article, we have introduced a new possibilistic logic on a logic of formal inconsistency with the aim of developing a possibility theoretic framework to deal with uncertainty and inconsistency meaningfully without leading to a system collapse. We have discussed the syntax and semantics for this logic and have proved the soundness and completeness theorems. A set of new measures of consistency, contradictoriness, and triviality of a set of formulas have been defined. These have then been put to use in an example to show that this framework can provide better means of machine reasoning.

math.LO