SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2508.11507

Covering the Euclidean Plane by a Pair of Trees

Abstract

A {$t$-stretch tree cover} of a metric space $M = (X,\delta)$, for a parameter $t \ge 1$, is a collection of trees such that every pair of points has a $t$-stretch path in one of the trees. Tree covers provide an important sketching tool that has found various applications over the years. The celebrated {Dumbbell Theorem} by Arya et al. [STOC'95] states that any set of points in the Euclidean plane admits a $(1+\epsilon)$-stretch tree cover with $O_\epsilon(1)$ trees. This result extends to any (constant) dimension and was also generalized for arbitrary doubling metrics by Bartal et al. [ICALP'19]. Although the number of trees provided by the Dumbbell Theorem is constant, this constant is not small, even for a stretch significantly larger than $1+\epsilon$. At the other extreme, any single tree on the vertices of a regular $n$-polygon must incur a stretch of $\Omega(n)$. Using known results of ultrametric embeddings, one can easily get a stretch of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ using two trees. The question of whether a low stretch can be achieved using two trees has remained illusive, even in the Euclidean plane. In this work, we resolve this fundamental question in the affirmative by presenting a constant-stretch cover with a pair of trees, for any set of points in the Euclidean plane. Our main technical contribution is a {surprisingly simple} Steiner construction, for which we provide a {tight} stretch analysis of $\sqrt{26}$. The Steiner points can be easily pruned if one is willing to increase the stretch by a small constant. Moreover, we can bound the maximum degree of the construction by a constant. Our result thus provides a simple yet effective reduction tool -- for problems that concern approximate distances -- from the Euclidean plane to a pair of trees. To demonstrate the potential power of this tool, we present some applications [...]

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hung Le, Lazar Milenković, Shay Solomon, Tianyi Zhang. 2025-08-15. Covering the Euclidean Plane by a Pair of Trees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11507

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG