SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2509.02179

Fast Computation of $k$-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares

Abstract

A $k$-mismatch square is a string of the form $XY$ where $X$ and $Y$ are two equal-length strings that have at most $k$ mismatches. Kolpakov and Kucherov [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2003] defined two notions of $k$-mismatch repeats, called $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs, each representing a sequence of consecutive $k$-mismatch squares of equal length. They proposed algorithms for computing $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs working in $O(nk \log k + output)$ time for a string of length $n$ over an integer alphabet, where $output$ is the number of the reported repeats. We show that $output=O(nk \log k)$, both in case of $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs, which implies that the complexity of their algorithms is actually $O(nk \log k)$. We apply this result to computing parameterized squares. A parameterized square is a string of the form $XY$ such that $X$ and $Y$ parameterized-match, i.e., there exists a bijection $f$ on the alphabet such that $f(X) = Y$. Two parameterized squares $XY$ and $X'Y'$ are equivalent if they parameterized match. Recently Hamai et al. [SPIRE 2024] showed that a string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ contains less than $n\sigma$ non-equivalent parameterized squares, improving an earlier bound by Kociumaka et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2016]. We apply our bound for $k$-mismatch repeats to propose an algorithm that reports all non-equivalent parameterized squares in $O(n\sigma \log \sigma)$ time. We also show that the number of non-equivalent parameterized squares can be computed in $O(n \log n)$ time. This last algorithm applies to squares under any substring compatible equivalence relation and also to counting squares that are distinct as strings. In particular, this improves upon the $O(n\sigma)$-time algorithm of Gawrychowski et al. [CPM 2023] for counting order-preserving squares that are distinct as strings if $\sigma = \omega(\log n)$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuto Nakashima, Jakub Radoszewski, Tomasz Waleń. 2025-09-02. Fast Computation of $k$-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.02179

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS