arXiv subjects

Jakub Radoszewski

Publications and source records attributed to Jakub Radoszewski.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Computing Smallest Suffixient Arrays in Sublinear Time

A suffixient array is a novel data structure that, when combined with an index providing direct access on a text $T$, allows us to answer a variety of pattern matching queries. In this work, we show how to compute a smallest suffixient array for $T[1\dots n]$ in $O(\frac{n\log \sigma}{\sqrt{\log n}}+\min(r,\bar{r})\log^\epsilon n)$ time for any $\epsilon > 0$, where $\sigma$ is the alphabet size of $T$ and $r$ and $\bar{r}$ are the numbers of equal-letter runs of the Burrows-Wheeler transforms of $T$ and its reverse $\overline{T}$, respectively. This time complexity becomes sublinear when $\sigma$ is small enough and $\min(r,\bar{r})=o(\frac{n}{\log^\epsilon n})$, yielding an asymptotic improvement over state-of-the-art algorithms. We also present a series of connected algorithmic results.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Space-Efficient k-Mismatch Text Indexes

A central task in string processing is text indexing, where the goal is to preprocess a text (a string of length $n$) into an efficient index (a data structure) supporting queries about the text. Cole, Gottlieb, and Lewenstein (STOC 2004) proposed $k$-errata trees, a family of text indexes supporting approximate pattern matching queries of several types. In particular, $k$-errata trees yield an elegant solution to $k$-mismatch queries, where we are to report all substrings of the text with Hamming distance at most $k$ to the query pattern. The resulting $k$-mismatch index uses $O(n\log^k n)$ space and answers a query for a length-$m$ pattern in $O(\log^k n \log \log n + m + occ)$ time, where $occ$ is the number of approximate occurrences. In retrospect, $k$-errata trees appear very well optimized: even though a large body of work has adapted $k$-errata trees to various settings throughout the past two decades, the original time-space trade-off for $k$-mismatch indexing has not been improved in the general case. We present the first such improvement, a $k$-mismatch index with $O(n\log^{k-1} n)$ space and the same query time as $k$-errata trees. Previously, due to a result of Chan, Lam, Sung, Tam, and Wong (Algorithmica 2010), such an $O(n\log^{k-1} n)$-size index has been known only for texts over alphabets of constant size. In this setting, however, we obtain an even smaller $k$-mismatch index of size only $O(n \log^{k-2+\varepsilon+\frac{2}{k+2-(k \bmod 2)}} n)\subseteq O(n\log^{k-1.5+\varepsilon} n)$ for $2\le k\le O(1)$ and any constant $\varepsilon>0$. Along the way, we also develop improved indexes for short patterns, offering better trade-offs in this practically relevant special case.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Subsequence Covers of Words

We introduce subsequence covers (s-covers, in short), a new type of covers of a word. A word $C$ is an s-cover of a word $S$ if the occurrences of $C$ in $S$ as subsequences cover all the positions in $S$. The s-covers seem to be computationally much harder than standard covers of words (cf. Apostolico et al., Inf. Process. Lett. 1991), but, on the other hand, much easier than the related shuffle powers (Warmuth and Haussler, J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 1984). We give a linear-time algorithm for testing if a candidate word $C$ is an s-cover of a word $S$ over a polynomially-bounded integer alphabet. We also give an algorithm for finding a shortest s-cover of a word $S$, which in the case of a constant-sized alphabet, also runs in linear time. The words without proper s-cover are called s-primitive. We complement our algorithmic results with explicit lower and an upper bound on the length of a longest s-primitive word. Both bounds are exponential in the size of the alphabet. The upper bound presented here improves the bound given in the conference version of this paper [SPIRE 2022].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Fast Computation of $k$-Runs, Parameterized Squares, and Other Generalised Squares

A $k$-mismatch square is a string of the form $XY$ where $X$ and $Y$ are two equal-length strings that have at most $k$ mismatches. Kolpakov and Kucherov [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2003] defined two notions of $k$-mismatch repeats, called $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs, each representing a sequence of consecutive $k$-mismatch squares of equal length. They proposed algorithms for computing $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs working in $O(nk \log k + output)$ time for a string of length $n$ over an integer alphabet, where $output$ is the number of the reported repeats. We show that $output=O(nk \log k)$, both in case of $k$-repetitions and $k$-runs, which implies that the complexity of their algorithms is actually $O(nk \log k)$. We apply this result to computing parameterized squares. A parameterized square is a string of the form $XY$ such that $X$ and $Y$ parameterized-match, i.e., there exists a bijection $f$ on the alphabet such that $f(X) = Y$. Two parameterized squares $XY$ and $X'Y'$ are equivalent if they parameterized match. Recently Hamai et al. [SPIRE 2024] showed that a string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ contains less than $n\sigma$ non-equivalent parameterized squares, improving an earlier bound by Kociumaka et al. [Theor. Comput. Sci., 2016]. We apply our bound for $k$-mismatch repeats to propose an algorithm that reports all non-equivalent parameterized squares in $O(n\sigma \log \sigma)$ time. We also show that the number of non-equivalent parameterized squares can be computed in $O(n \log n)$ time. This last algorithm applies to squares under any substring compatible equivalence relation and also to counting squares that are distinct as strings. In particular, this improves upon the $O(n\sigma)$-time algorithm of Gawrychowski et al. [CPM 2023] for counting order-preserving squares that are distinct as strings if $\sigma = \omega(\log n)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

Counting Distinct Square Substrings in Sublinear Time

We show that the number of distinct squares in a packed string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ can be computed in $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time in the word-RAM model. This paper is the first to introduce a sublinear-time algorithm for counting squares in the packed setting. The packed representation of a string of length $n$ over an alphabet of size $\sigma$ is given as a sequence of $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ machine words in the word-RAM model (a machine word consists of $\omega \ge \log_2 n$ bits). Previously, it was known how to count distinct squares in $O(n)$ time [Gusfield and Stoye, JCSS 2004], even for a string over an integer alphabet [Crochemore et al., TCS 2014; Bannai et al., CPM 2017; Charalampopoulos et al., SPIRE 2020]. We use the techniques for extracting squares from runs described by Crochemore et al. [TCS 2014]. However, the packed model requires novel approaches. We need an $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$-sized representation of all long-period runs (runs with period $\Omega(\log_\sigma n)$) which allows for a sublinear-time counting of the -- potentially linearly-many -- implied squares. The long-period runs with a string period that is periodic itself (called layer runs) are an obstacle, since their number can be $\Omega(n)$. The number of all other long-period runs is $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ and we can construct an implicit representation of all long-period runs in $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time by leveraging the insights of Amir et al. [ESA 2019]. We count squares in layer runs by exploiting combinatorial properties of pyramidally-shaped groups of layer runs. Another difficulty lies in computing the locations of Lyndon roots of runs in packed strings, which is needed for grouping runs that may generate equal squares. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce sparse-Lyndon roots which are based on string synchronizers [Kempa and Kociumaka, STOC 2019].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Elastic-Degenerate String Comparison

An elastic-degenerate (ED) string $T$ is a sequence of $n$ sets $T[1],\ldots,T[n]$ containing $m$ strings in total whose cumulative length is $N$. We call $n$, $m$, and $N$ the length, the cardinality and the size of $T$, respectively. The language of $T$ is defined as $L(T)=\{S_1 \cdots S_n\,:\,S_i \in T[i]$ for all $i\in[1,n]\}$. ED strings have been introduced to represent a set of closely-related DNA sequences, also known as a pangenome. The basic question we investigate here is: Given two ED strings, how fast can we check whether the two languages they represent have a nonempty intersection? We call the underlying problem the ED String Intersection (EDSI) problem.For two ED strings $T_1$ and $T_2$ of lengths $n_1$ and $n_2$, cardinalities $m_1$ and $m_2$, and sizes $N_1$ and $N_2$, respectively, we show the following: - There is no $O((N_1N_2)^{1-\epsilon})$-time algorithm, for any constant $\epsilon>0$, for EDSI even when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are over a binary alphabet, unless the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis is false. - There is no combinatorial $O((N_1+N_2)^{1.2-\epsilon}f(n_1,n_2))$-time algorithm, for any constant $\epsilon>0$ and any function $f$, for EDSI even when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are over a binary alphabet, unless the Boolean Matrix Multiplication conjecture is false. - An $O(N_1\log N_1\log n_1+N_2\log N_2\log n_2)$-time algorithm for outputting a compact (RLE) representation of the intersection language of two unary ED strings. In the case when $T_1$ and $T_2$ are given in a compact representation, we show that the problem is NP-complete. - An $O(N_1m_2+N_2m_1)$-time algorithm for EDSI. - An $\tilde{O}(N_1^{\omega-1}n_2+N_2^{\omega-1}n_1)$-time algorithm for EDSI, where $\omega$ is the exponent of matrix multiplication; the $\tilde{O}$ notation suppresses factors that are polylogarithmic in the input size.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Computing String Covers in Sublinear Time

Let $T$ be a string of length $n$ over an integer alphabet of size $\sigma$. In the word RAM model, $T$ can be represented in $O(n /\log_\sigma n)$ space. We show that a representation of all covers of $T$ can be computed in the optimal $O(n/\log_\sigma n)$ time; in particular, the shortest cover can be computed within this time. We also design an $O(n(\log\sigma + \log \log n)/\log n)$-sized data structure that computes in $O(1)$ time any element of the so-called (shortest) cover array of $T$, that is, the length of the shortest cover of any given prefix of $T$. As a by-product, we describe the structure of cover arrays of Fibonacci strings. On the negative side, we show that the shortest cover of a length-$n$ string cannot be computed using $o(n/\log n)$ operations in the PILLAR model of Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, and Wellnitz (FOCS 2020).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Tight bounds on the number of non-equivalent parameterized squares in a word

Two words $x,y$ of the same length are said to be \emph{parameterized equivalent} if there exists a character bijection that transforms $x$ into $y$. A word $w$ is called a parameterized square if $w$ is a concatenation of two parameterized equivalent words. Kociumaka et al. [TCS 2016] showed that in a word of length $n$ that contains $\sigma$ distinct characters, the number of \emph{parameterized squares} that are non-equivalent with respect to parameterized equivalence is at most $2 \sigma! n$. In this paper, we show that the maximum number of non-equivalent parameterized squares is less than $\sigma n$, which significantly improves the best-known upper bound by Kociumaka et al. Moreover, we construct a family of words containing $\Omega(\sigma n)$ non-equivalent parameterized squares, which demonstrates that the upper bound is asymptotically tight.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2024

Approximate Circular Pattern Matching under Edit Distance

In the $k$-Edit Circular Pattern Matching ($k$-Edit CPM) problem, we are given a length-$n$ text $T$, a length-$m$ pattern $P$, and a positive integer threshold $k$, and we are to report all starting positions of the substrings of $T$ that are at edit distance at most $k$ from some cyclic rotation of $P$. In the decision version of the problem, we are to check if any such substring exists. Very recently, Charalampopoulos et al. [ESA 2022] presented $O(nk^2)$-time and $O(nk \log^3 k)$-time solutions for the reporting and decision versions of $k$-Edit CPM, respectively. Here, we show that the reporting and decision versions of $k$-Edit CPM can be solved in $O(n+(n/m) k^6)$ time and $O(n+(n/m) k^5 \log^3 k)$ time, respectively, thus obtaining the first algorithms with a complexity of the type $O(n+(n/m) \mathrm{poly}(k))$ for this problem. Notably, our algorithms run in $O(n)$ time when $m=\Omega(k^6)$ and are superior to the previous respective solutions when $m=\omega(k^4)$. We provide a meta-algorithm that yields efficient algorithms in several other interesting settings, such as when the strings are given in a compressed form (as straight-line programs), when the strings are dynamic, or when we have a quantum computer. We obtain our solutions by exploiting the structure of approximate circular occurrences of $P$ in $T$, when $T$ is relatively short w.r.t. $P$. Roughly speaking, either the starting positions of approximate occurrences of rotations of $P$ form $O(k^4)$ intervals that can be computed efficiently, or some rotation of $P$ is almost periodic (is at a small edit distance from a string with small period). Dealing with the almost periodic case is the most technically demanding part of this work; we tackle it using properties of locked fragments (originating from [Cole and Hariharan, SICOMP 2002]).

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Linear Time Construction of Cover Suffix Tree and Applications

The Cover Suffix Tree (CST) of a string $T$ is the suffix tree of $T$ with additional explicit nodes corresponding to halves of square substrings of $T$. In the CST an explicit node corresponding to a substring $C$ of $T$ is annotated with two numbers: the number of non-overlapping consecutive occurrences of $C$ and the total number of positions in $T$ that are covered by occurrences of $C$ in $T$. Kociumaka et al. (Algorithmica, 2015) have shown how to compute the CST of a length-$n$ string in $O(n \log n)$ time. We show how to compute the CST in $O(n)$ time assuming that $T$ is over an integer alphabet. Kociumaka et al. (Algorithmica, 2015; Theor. Comput. Sci., 2018) have shown that knowing the CST of a length-$n$ string $T$, one can compute a linear-sized representation of all seeds of $T$ as well as all shortest $α$-partial covers and seeds in $T$ for a given $α$ in $O(n)$ time. Thus our result implies linear-time algorithms computing these notions of quasiperiodicity. The resulting algorithm computing seeds is substantially different from the previous one (Kociumaka et al., SODA 2012, ACM Trans. Algorithms, 2020). Kociumaka et al. (Algorithmica, 2015) proposed an $O(n \log n)$-time algorithm for computing a shortest $α$-partial cover for each $α=1,\ldots,n$; we improve this complexity to $O(n)$. Our results are based on a new characterization of consecutive overlapping occurrences of a substring $S$ of $T$ in terms of the set of runs (see Kolpakov and Kucherov, FOCS 1999) in $T$. This new insight also leads to an $O(n)$-sized index for reporting overlapping consecutive occurrences of a given pattern $P$ of length $m$ in $O(m+output)$ time, where $output$ is the number of occurrences reported. In comparison, a general index for reporting bounded-gap consecutive occurrences of Navarro and Thankachan (Theor. Comput. Sci., 2016) uses $O(n \log n)$ space.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2023

Internal Pattern Matching Queries in a Text and Applications

We consider several types of internal queries, that is, questions about fragments of a given text $T$ specified in constant space by their locations in $T$. Our main result is an optimal data structure for Internal Pattern Matching (IPM) queries which, given two fragments $x$ and $y$, ask for a representation of all fragments contained in $y$ and matching $x$ exactly; this problem can be viewed as an internal version of the Exact Pattern Matching problem. Our data structure answers IPM queries in time proportional to the quotient $|y|/|x|$ of fragments' lengths, which is required due to the information content of the output. If $T$ is a text of length $n$ over an integer alphabet of size $σ$, then our data structure occupies $O(n/ \log_σn)$ machine words (that is, $O(n\log σ)$ bits) and admits an $O(n/ \log_σn)$-time construction algorithm. We show the applicability of IPM queries for answering internal queries corresponding to other classic string processing problems. Among others, we derive optimal data structures reporting the periods of a fragment and testing the cyclic equivalence of two fragments. IPM queries have already found numerous further applications, following the path paved by the classic Longest Common Extension (LCE) queries of Landau and Vishkin (JCSS, 1988). In particular, IPM queries have been implemented in grammar-compressed and dynamic settings and, along with LCE queries, constitute elementary operations of the PILLAR model, developed by Charalampopoulos, Kociumaka, and Wellnitz (FOCS 2020). On the way to our main result, we provide a novel construction of string synchronizing sets of Kempa and Kociumaka (STOC 2019). Our method, based on a new restricted version of the recompression technique of Jeż (J. ACM, 2016), yields a hierarchy of $O(\log n)$ string synchronizing sets covering the whole spectrum of fragments' lengths.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Approximate Circular Pattern Matching

We consider approximate circular pattern matching (CPM, in short) under the Hamming and edit distance, in which we are given a length-$n$ text $T$, a length-$m$ pattern $P$, and a threshold $k>0$, and we are to report all starting positions of fragments of $T$ (called occurrences) that are at distance at most $k$ from some cyclic rotation of $P$. In the decision version of the problem, we are to check if any such occurrence exists. All previous results for approximate CPM were either average-case upper bounds or heuristics, except for the work of Charalampopoulos et al. [CKP$^+$, JCSS'21], who considered only the Hamming distance. For the reporting version of the approximate CPM problem, under the Hamming distance we improve upon the main algorithm of [CKP$^+$, JCSS'21] from ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^4)$ to ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^3)$ time; for the edit distance, we give an ${\cal O}(nk^2)$-time algorithm. We also consider the decision version of the approximate CPM problem. Under the Hamming distance, we obtain an ${\cal O}(n+(n/m)\cdot k^2\log k/\log\log k)$-time algorithm, which nearly matches the algorithm by Chan et al. [CGKKP, STOC'20] for the standard counterpart of the problem. Under the edit distance, the ${\cal O}(nk\log^2 k)$ running time of our algorithm nearly matches the ${\cal O}(nk)$ running time of the Landau-Vishkin algorithm [LV, J. Algorithms'89]. As a stepping stone, we propose an ${\cal O}(nk\log^2 k)$-time algorithm for the Longest Prefix $k'$-Approximate Match problem, proposed by Landau et al. [LMS, SICOMP'98], for all $k'\in \{1,\dots,k\}$. We give a conditional lower bound that suggests a polynomial separation between approximate CPM under the Hamming distance over the binary alphabet and its non-circular counterpart. We also show that a strongly subquadratic-time algorithm for the decision version of approximate CPM under edit distance would refute SETH.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

A note on the maximum number of $k$-powers in a finite word

A \emph{power} is a word of the form $\underbrace{uu...u}_{k \; \text{times}}$, where $u$ is a word and $k$ is a positive integer; the power is also called a {\em $k$-power} and $k$ is its {\em exponent}. We prove that for any $k \ge 2$, the maximum number of different non-empty $k$-power factors in a word of length $n$ is between $\frac{n}{k-1}-Θ(\sqrt{n})$ and $\frac{n-1}{k-1}$. We also show that the maximum number of different non-empty power factors of exponent at least 2 in a length-$n$ word is at most $n-1$. Both upper bounds generalize the recent upper bound of $n-1$ on the maximum number of different square factors in a length-$n$ word by Brlek and Li (2022).

math.CO↗

arXiv2021

Hardness of Detecting Abelian and Additive Square Factors in Strings

We prove 3SUM-hardness (no strongly subquadratic-time algorithm, assuming the 3SUM conjecture) of several problems related to finding Abelian square and additive square factors in a string. In particular, we conclude conditional optimality of the state-of-the-art algorithms for finding such factors. Overall, we show 3SUM-hardness of (a) detecting an Abelian square factor of an odd half-length, (b) computing centers of all Abelian square factors, (c) detecting an additive square factor in a length-$n$ string of integers of magnitude $n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$, and (d) a problem of computing a double 3-term arithmetic progression (i.e., finding indices $i \ne j$ such that $(x_i+x_j)/2=x_{(i+j)/2}$) in a sequence of integers $x_1,\dots,x_n$ of magnitude $n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. Problem (d) is essentially a convolution version of the AVERAGE problem that was proposed in a manuscript of Erickson. We obtain a conditional lower bound for it with the aid of techniques recently developed by Dudek et al. [STOC 2020]. Problem (d) immediately reduces to problem (c) and is a step in reductions to problems (a) and (b). In conditional lower bounds for problems (a) and (b) we apply an encoding of Amir et al. [ICALP 2014] and extend it using several string gadgets that include arbitrarily long Abelian-square-free strings. Our reductions also imply conditional lower bounds for detecting Abelian squares in strings over a constant-sized alphabet. We also show a subquadratic upper bound in this case, applying a result of Chan and Lewenstein [STOC 2015].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Efficient Computation of Sequence Mappability

In the $(k,m)$-mappability problem, for a given sequence $T$ of length $n$, the goal is to compute a table whose $i$th entry is the number of indices $j \ne i$ such that the length-$m$ substrings of $T$ starting at positions $i$ and $j$ have at most $k$ mismatches. Previous works on this problem focused on heuristics computing a rough approximation of the result or on the case of $k=1$. We present several efficient algorithms for the general case of the problem. Our main result is an algorithm that, for $k=\mathcal{O}(1)$, works in $\mathcal{O}(n)$ space and, with high probability, in $\mathcal{O}(n \cdot \min\{m^k,\log^k n\})$ time. Our algorithm requires a careful adaptation of the $k$-errata trees of Cole et al. [STOC 2004] to avoid multiple counting of pairs of substrings. Our technique can also be applied to solve the all-pairs Hamming distance problem introduced by Crochemore et al. [WABI 2017]. We further develop $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$-time algorithms to compute all $(k,m)$-mappability tables for a fixed $m$ and all $k\in \{0,\ldots,m\}$ or a fixed $k$ and all $m\in\{k,\ldots,n\}$. Finally, we show that, for $k,m = Θ(\log n)$, the $(k,m)$-mappability problem cannot be solved in strongly subquadratic time unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. This is an improved and extended version of a paper that was presented at SPIRE 2018.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Faster Algorithms for Longest Common Substring

In the classic longest common substring (LCS) problem, we are given two strings $S$ and $T$, each of length at most $n$, over an alphabet of size $\sigma$, and we are asked to find a longest string occurring as a fragment of both $S$ and $T$. Weiner, in his seminal paper that introduced the suffix tree, presented an $O(n \log \sigma)$-time algorithm for this problem [SWAT 1973]. For polynomially-bounded integer alphabets, the linear-time construction of suffix trees by Farach yielded an $O(n)$-time algorithm for the LCS problem [FOCS 1997]. However, for small alphabets, this is not necessarily optimal for the LCS problem in the word RAM model of computation, in which the strings can be stored in $O(n \log \sigma/\log n )$ space and read in $O(n \log \sigma/\log n )$ time. We show that, in this model, we can compute an LCS in time $O(n \log \sigma / \sqrt{\log n})$, which is sublinear in $n$ if $\sigma=2^{o(\sqrt{\log n})}$ (in particular, if $\sigma=O(1)$), using optimal space $O(n \log \sigma/\log n)$. In fact, it was recently shown that this result is conditionally optimal [Kempa and Kociumaka, STOC 2025]. We then lift our ideas to the problem of computing a $k$-mismatch LCS, which has received considerable attention in recent years. In this problem, the aim is to compute a longest substring of $S$ that occurs in $T$ with at most $k$ mismatches. Thankachan et al.~showed how to compute a $k$-mismatch LCS in $O(n \log^k n)$ time for $k=O(1)$ [J. Comput. Biol. 2016]. We show an $O(n \log^{k-1/2} n)$-time algorithm, for any constant $k>0$ and irrespective of the alphabet size, using $O(n)$ space as the previous approaches. We thus notably break through the well-known $n \log^k n$ barrier, which stems from a recursive heavy-path decomposition technique that was first introduced in the seminal paper of Cole et al. [STOC 2004] for string indexing with $k$ errors.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

Internal Quasiperiod Queries

Internal pattern matching requires one to answer queries about factors of a given string. Many results are known on answering internal period queries, asking for the periods of a given factor. In this paper we investigate (for the first time) internal queries asking for covers (also known as quasiperiods) of a given factor. We propose a data structure that answers such queries in $O(\log n \log \log n)$ time for the shortest cover and in $O(\log n (\log \log n)^2)$ time for a representation of all the covers, after $O(n \log n)$ time and space preprocessing.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2020

The Number of Repetitions in 2D-Strings

The notions of periodicity and repetitions in strings, and hence these of runs and squares, naturally extend to two-dimensional strings. We consider two types of repetitions in 2D-strings: 2D-runs and quartics (quartics are a 2D-version of squares in standard strings). Amir et al. introduced 2D-runs, showed that there are $O(n^3)$ of them in an $n \times n$ 2D-string and presented a simple construction giving a lower bound of $Ω(n^2)$ for their number (TCS 2020). We make a significant step towards closing the gap between these bounds by showing that the number of 2D-runs in an $n \times n$ 2D-string is $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. In particular, our bound implies that the $O(n^2\log n + \textsf{output})$ run-time of the algorithm of Amir et al. for computing 2D-runs is also $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. We expect this result to allow for exploiting 2D-runs algorithmically in the area of 2D pattern matching. A quartic is a 2D-string composed of $2 \times 2$ identical blocks (2D-strings) that was introduced by Apostolico and Brimkov (TCS 2000), where by quartics they meant only primitively rooted quartics, i.e. built of a primitive block. Here our notion of quartics is more general and analogous to that of squares in 1D-strings. Apostolico and Brimkov showed that there are $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$ occurrences of primitively rooted quartics in an $n \times n$ 2D-string and that this bound is attainable. Consequently the number of distinct primitively rooted quartics is $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. Here, we prove that the number of distinct general quartics is also $O(n^2 \log^2 n)$. This extends the rich combinatorial study of the number of distinct squares in a 1D-string, that was initiated by Fraenkel and Simpson (J. Comb. Theory A 1998), to two dimensions. Finally, we show some algorithmic applications of 2D-runs. (Abstract shortened due to arXiv requirements.)

cs.DS↗