Searcharxiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.09089

Beyond Tag Collision: Cluster-based Memory Management for Tag-based Sanitizers

Mengfei Xie·Yan Lin·Hongtao Wu·Jianming Fu·Chenke Luo·Guojun Peng
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Tag-based sanitizers attach a small "key" to each pointer and a matching "lock" tag to its target memory object, enabling runtime verification of pointer-object consistency and helping developers to detect potential memory violations. However, the limited tag encoding space challenges existing studies in assigning distinct tags to memory objects across temporal and spatial dimensions, leading to potential tag collisions. In this paper, we present ClusterTag, a novel cluster-based memory allocator aimed at simultaneously mitigating tag collisions in both temporal and spatial dimensions. The core design of ClusterTag effectively balances the significant mismatch between tag encoding space and memory objects: it divides memory objects into multiple independent clusters, thereby limiting tag collisions to finite chunks within each cluster. To mitigate tag collisions across clusters, we design a cluster-grained heap randomization scheme. This approach introduces random address intervals between clusters and further breaks the entropy limitation of the tag space. ClusterTag has been implemented as an independent memory allocator that seamlessly integrates with tag-based sanitizers such as HWASan, and maintains comparable performance overhead (within 1%) at various randomization densities. Security evaluations on the Juliet dataset indicate that ClusterTag exhibits deterministic results across 500 repeated tests (5,652 reported and 1,530 missed), while the existing three types of tag assignment strategies all exhibit probabilistic false negatives due to tag collisions. Quantitative analysis across three tag collision distance metrics-minimum, average, and unpredictability-demonstrates that ClusterTag achieves balanced improvements across all three, whereas prior tag assignment schemes (random, staggered, fixed) show significant trade-offs in at least one metric.

Explore related subjects

cs.CR

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Mengfei Xie, Yan Lin, Hongtao Wu, Jianming Fu, Chenke Luo, Guojun Peng. 2025-09-11. Beyond Tag Collision: Cluster-based Memory Management for Tag-based Sanitizers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09089

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Membership Inference Attacks on NLP Text Classifiers: A Baseline Study on SST-2

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) try to determine whether a specific record was used to train a model, a privacy risk that matters in natural language processing (NLP), where training data can contain sensitive user text. This paper presents a controlled benchmark of membership inference vulnerability for text classification on the GLUE SST-2 sentiment dataset. A TF-IDF + Logistic Regression pipeline and a fine-tuned DistilBERT classifier are compared under a loss-threshold MIA, with utility measured by development accuracy and macro F1. DistilBERT reached 0.9466 accuracy and 0.9460 macro F1 against 0.8756 and 0.8727 for Logistic Regression, yet both models leaked membership signal (Attack AUC 0.5615 and 0.5800, respectively). Two mitigations were tested. Stronger regularization reduced leakage for Logistic Regression at a visible utility cost, whereas fine-tuning DistilBERT for 2 epochs instead of 3 reduced leakage with negligible accuracy loss. Lightweight training adjustments can improve the privacy-utility trade-off without complex defenses.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.

cs.CR↗
arXiv2026

DeFiFusion: Combining Transaction Events with Smart Contracts to Detect Price Manipulation Attacks

Decentralized Finance (DeFi) has emerged as a rapidly growing blockchain-based financial service, where market transaction dynamics and underlying smart contract logic are intricately intertwined. This autonomous interplay, while eliminating centralized intermediaries, significantly expands the vulnerability surface of DeFi protocols to Price Manipulation Attacks (PMAs), which have already inflicted catastrophic financial losses. Despite their gravity, existing detection paradigms suffer from fundamental limitations. Transaction-centric methods lack awareness of contract execution semantics, making them prone to false positives under legitimate market volatility, while static contract analyses ignore real transaction behaviors and frequently report vulnerabilities that are infeasible to exploit in practice. We present DeFiFusion, a dual-modal PMA detection framework that closes this gap by jointly modeling transaction events and smart contract semantics within a unified pipeline. Our core insight is that PMA maliciousness emerges only from the interaction between transaction behaviors and the contract logic they exploit; neither signal suffices in isolation. Accordingly, we derive price-manipulation-aware event encoding for extracting fine-grained temporal and economic features tailored to manipulation patterns. We further introduce LLM-based contract semantic extraction to supply the execution-logic context that prior behavioral methods lack. To fuse these modalities, we propose a Dual-Modal Projection-Fusion Transformer with T5-style relative positional encoding, capturing the cyclic multi-stage execution structures that distinguish PMAs from benign market activity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that DeFiFusion consistently achieves state-of-the-art detection performance, effectively recalling 222 of the 225 PMA cases while maintaining a precision of 96.10%.

cs.CR↗