A Better-Than-$5/4$-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity

Felix Hommelsheim; Alexander Lindermayr; Zhenwei Liu

Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2509.19655

A Better-Than-$5/4$-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity

Felix Hommelsheim·Alexander Lindermayr·Zhenwei Liu

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The 2-Edge-Connected Spanning Subgraph Problem (2ECSS) is a fundamental problem in survivable network design. Given an undirected $2$-edge-connected graph, the goal is to find a $2$-edge-connected spanning subgraph with the minimum number of edges; a graph is 2-edge-connected if it is connected after the removal of any single edge. 2ECSS is APX-hard and has been extensively studied in the context of approximation algorithms. Very recently, Bosch-Calvo, Garg, Grandoni, Hommelsheim, Jabal Ameli, and Lindermayr showed the currently best-known approximation ratio of $\frac{5}{4}$ [STOC 2025]. This factor is tight for many of their techniques and arguments, and it was not clear whether $\frac{5}{4}$ can be improved. We break this natural barrier and present a $(\frac{5}{4} - \eta)$-approximation algorithm, for some constant $\eta \geq 10^{-6}$. On a high level, we follow the approach of previous works: take a triangle-free $2$-edge cover and transform it into a 2-edge-connected spanning subgraph by adding only a few additional edges. For $\geq \frac{5}{4}$-approximations, one can heavily exploit that a $4$-cycle in the 2-edge cover can ``buy'' one additional edge. This enables simple and nice techniques, but immediately fails for our improved approximation ratio. To overcome this, we design two complementary algorithms that perform well for different scenarios: one for few $4$-cycles and one for many $4$-cycles. Besides this, there appear more obstructions when breaching $\frac54$, which we surpass via new techniques such as colorful bridge covering, rich vertices, and branching gluing paths.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Felix Hommelsheim, Alexander Lindermayr, Zhenwei Liu. 2025-09-24. A Better-Than-$5/4$-Approximation for Two-Edge Connectivity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19655

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

A deterministic $(1+\varepsilon)^n$ approximation for the permanent of a nonnegative matrix

For every fixed $0<\varepsilon\le1$, we give a deterministic strongly polynomial algorithm that, given a nonnegative matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}_{\ge0}^{n\times n}$, returns $Q$ satisfying $\operatorname{per} A\le Q\le(1+\varepsilon)^n\operatorname{per} A$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗