SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.07869

USIM and U0: A Vision-Language-Action Dataset and Model for General Underwater Robots

Abstract

Underwater environments pose unique challenges for robotic navigation and manipulation. While existing research has primarily focused on task-specific methods, studies on general-purpose intelligence for multi-task execution remain scarce. To address this gap, we propose a unified framework for general-purpose underwater robots that integrates perception and action driven by language instructions. First, we develop a data synthesis pipeline to construct USIM, a simulation-based dataset which comprises over 905K frames from 2275 trajectories, totaling approximately 25 hours of BlueROV2 interactions. Furthermore, we propose U0, a vision-language-action (VLA) model capable of executing various tasks from obstacle-avoidance navigation to three-dimensional mobile manipulation. The model features a convolution-attention-based perception (CAP) module, which incorporates target pose estimation as an auxiliary task to explicitly bolster the model's spatial awareness. For evaluation, we establish a systematic assessment framework and an automated pipeline encompassing both offline metrics and online task execution. Experimental results demonstrate that the USIM dataset significantly empowers existing VLA models to adapt to underwater scenarios. Notably, our U0 model achieves state-of-the-art performance: it reduces the offline mean action prediction error to 0.0359 and achieves an overall online success rate of 43.1%, marking a 5.5% improvement over existing competitive baselines (below 37.6%), with navigation tasks reaching as high as 87.5%. These results validate the feasibility of general-purpose intelligence in underwater robotics, providing a foundation for scalable dataset synthesis and aquatic embodied agents.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Junwen Gu, Zhiheng Wu, Pengxuan Si, Shuang Qiu, Zhentao Zhang, Yukai Feng, Luoyang Sun, Laien Luo, Lianyi Yu, Jian Wang, Zhengxing Wu. 2025-10-09. USIM and U0: A Vision-Language-Action Dataset and Model for General Underwater Robots. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07869

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

IMLE-VLA: Fast Single-Step Action Generation for Vision-Language-Action Policies

Vision-language-action (VLA) policies leverage pretrained vision-language backbones to achieve strong cross-task generalization. A leading design couples this backbone with a dedicated continuous action head trained via diffusion or flow matching. However, such heads rely on iterative multi-step sampling, for example 10 Euler steps in $\pi_{0.5}$. This creates an inference bottleneck that produces stop-and-go movement in the robot and slower task completion. We introduce IMLE-VLA, which replaces the iterative action head with a single-step conditional generator trained via conditional Implicit Maximum Likelihood Estimation (cIMLE). The cIMLE objective promotes multimodal action coverage, avoiding the mode collapse of naive regression heads while eliminating multi-step sampling entirely. When IMLE-VLA is applied to $\pi_{0.5}$, it increases inference frequency 3.67x (55 Hz vs. 15 Hz), enabling up to 11x higher action throughput. On the 40-task LIBERO benchmark, IMLE-VLA achieves the highest average success rate (98.0%) among all baselines while leading in inference frequency. Under the test-time perturbations of LIBERO-plus, IMLE-VLA retains $\pi_{0.5}$'s robustness while other baselines degrade sharply, confirming that the cIMLE head preserves generalization. Real-world experiments on a Franka Emika Panda across four tasks demonstrate smoother motion (2.2x to 3.0x lower jerk) and faster task completion, with IMLE-VLA outperforming $\pi_{0.5}$ on every task and reducing average VLA inference time per episode by 3.9x to 6.6x. Videos and code are available at https://kianhk6.github.io/IMLE-VLA/

cs.RO

ObstaDiff: Generalizable Diffusion Policy Learning via Obstacle-aware Representations

Imitation learning has achieved impressive results in robotic manipulation, yet most existing approaches assume clean backgrounds and lack explicit mechanisms for obstacle-aware motion generation. Extending such policies to cluttered, real-world scenes with unstructured obstacles remains a key generalization challenge. We present ObstaDiff, a decomposed diffusion-policy framework with a lightweight obstacle-aware visual encoder. ObstaDiff extracts a structured target-obstacle-background representation, enabling the downstream alignment policy to generate end-effector trajectories toward a target-centered bottleneck pose while reasoning about surrounding obstacles. We evaluate ObstaDiff on 61 real-robot greenhouse trials per method (366 executions in total). ObstaDiff achieves 75.41% average task success and 8.20% average obstacle collision rate, outperforming representative imitation-learning baselines and improving generalization in cluttered agricultural scenes.

cs.RO

Testing Between the Test Cases: Proving End-to-End Steering in Conditions You Never Drove

AI-based automated vehicle testing is challenging because a model that passes every test condition can still fail in the real world. Formal verification offers a way to directly address this gap. On a simulated highway and an arterial road we trained two small end-to-end steering networks each in CARLA, one on clear conditions alone and one on clear, fog, night and low sun. All four models were driven against a 2.19 ft lane-departure budget. Without driving again, we used bound propagation, a formal method that reads the trained weights, to compute how far steering can drift at every disturbance strength between two captured images. One calculation covers more than a campaign could drive: on the arterial it spans 133 poses, where ten intensities each would be 10^133 combinations, in minutes on one GPU. Not only did formal verification find conditions that broke the clear-trained policy without simulation testing, it provided some preliminary evidence for potential failures between the test cases. Our overall conclusion is that formal verification is a viable complement to simulation, and could be adopted as a part of verification and validation for automated driving.

cs.RO