SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.16886

Equilibrium-Constrained Estimation of Recursive Logit Choice Models

Abstract

The recursive logit (RL) model provides a flexible framework for modeling sequential decision-making in transportation and choice networks, with important applications in route choice analysis, multiple discrete choice problems, and activity-based travel demand modeling. Despite its versatility, estimation of the RL model typically relies on nested fixed-point (NFXP) algorithms that are computationally expensive and prone to numerical instability. We propose a new approach that reformulates the maximum likelihood estimation problem as an optimization problem with equilibrium constraints, where both the structural parameters and the value functions are treated as decision variables. We further show that this formulation can be equivalently transformed into a conic optimization problem with exponential cones, enabling efficient solution using modern conic solvers such as MOSEK. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that our convex reformulation achieves accuracy comparable to traditional methods while offering significant improvements in computational stability and efficiency, thereby providing a practical and scalable alternative for recursive logit model estimation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Hung Tran, Tien Mai, Minh Hoang Ha. 2025-10-19. Equilibrium-Constrained Estimation of Recursive Logit Choice Models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16886

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Identification in Linear Quantile Panel Models

This paper studies identification in linear quantile panel models with unrestricted individual heterogeneity when the number of time periods is fixed and small. We impose strict exogeneity, whereby the conditional quantile restriction holds given the individual's complete regressor history and latent individual effect, but otherwise allow the disturbances to be arbitrarily dependent over time.

econ.EM

Experimental Design for Policy Choice

We show how to optimally design experiments when the resulting data will be used to choose a welfare-maximizing policy subject to constraints. A decision maker seeks to maximize Bayes expected welfare by choosing a policy whose effects depend on an unknown finite-dimensional parameter. The decision maker has access to a first wave of experimental data with a fixed design but may choose the design of a second wave that will be collected before choosing the policy. The resulting experimental design--policy choice problem is a very high-dimensional dynamic program that is generally intractable in finite samples. We propose a tractable approximation based on the limit experiment and show it is asymptotically optimal using a new asymptotic representation theorem for adaptive experiments with continuous treatments. We apply the method to a conditional cash transfer experiment and demonstrate the potential for large gains from tailoring the experiment to the policy choice.

econ.EM

Designing Spatial Treatments

Spatial treatments are interventions assigned to locations potentially distinct from those of the responding units. We study their optimal design under a general model in which a unit's response diminishes with distance to a treated site. Our estimand of interest is an ``uncontaminated'' effect equal to the average impact of a single intervention site over all hypothetical sites. We propose a novel design based on a Mat\'{e}rn point process which separates treatments by a distance of at least $r$. A larger choice of $r$ reduces bias by separating interventions but increases variance by reducing their numerosity. We choose $r$ to maximize the rate of convergence of a Horvitz-Thompson estimator and prove that this is minimax rate-optimal. We provide weak conditions under which the estimator is asymptotically normal and propose a variance estimator.

econ.EM