SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.18597

On the Computation of Schrijver's Kernels

Abstract

The geometry of a graph $G$ embedded on a closed oriented surface $S$ can be probed by counting the intersections of $G$ with closed curves on $S$. Of special interest is the map $c \mapsto \mu_G(c)$ counting the minimum number of intersections between $G$ and any curve freely homotopic to a given curve $c$. Schrijver [On the uniqueness of kernels, 1992] calls $G$ a kernel if for any proper graph minor $H$ of $G$ we have $\mu_H < \mu_G$. Hence, $G$ admits a minor $H$ which is a kernel and such that $\mu_G = \mu_H$. We show how to compute such a minor kernel of $G$ in $O(n^3 \log n)$ time where $n$ is the number of edges of $G$, and $g\ge 2$ is the genus of $S$. Our algorithm leverages a tight bound on the size of minimal bigons in a system of closed curves. It also relies on several subroutines of independent interest including the computation of the area enclosed by a curve and a test of simplicity for the lift of a curve in the universal covering of $S$. As a consequence of our minor kernel algorithm and a recent result of Dubois [Making multicurves cross minimally on surfaces, 2024], after a preprocessing that takes $O(n^3 \log n)$ time and $O(n)$ space, we are able to compute $\mu_G(c)$ in $O(g (n + \ell) \log(n + \ell))$ time given any closed walk $c$ with $\ell$ edges. The state-of-the-art algorithm by Colin de Verdi\`ere and Erickson [Tightening non-simple paths and cycles on surfaces, 2010] would avoid constructing a kernel but would lead to a computation of $\mu_G(c)$ in $O(g n \ell \log(n \ell))$ time (with a preprocessing that takes $O(gn\log n)$ time and $O(gn)$ space). Another consequence of the computation of minor kernels is the ability to decide in polynomial time whether two graph minors $H$ and $H'$ of $G$ satisfy $\mu_H = \mu_{H'}$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Vincent Delecroix, Oscar Fontaine, Francis Lazarus. 2025-10-21. On the Computation of Schrijver's Kernels. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18597

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Almost Linear Universal Point Sets for Planar Graphs

A point set is universal for planar graphs on $n$ vertices if every such graph has a straight-line drawing without crossings whose vertices belong to the set. We construct universal point sets of size $n^{1+o(1)}$, improving the previous quadratic upper bound. Our construction uses the reduction of Bannister, Cheng, Devanny, and Eppstein from universal point sets to superpatterns for $213$-avoiding permutations. We represent these permutations by ordered rooted forests and construct a small family of intervals containing every such forest. The result follows from a straightforward bound on the size of the family of intervals. GPT-6 Astra assisted in developing the construction and proof.

cs.CG

Some results on Archdeacon's conjecture for rotation systems

A rotation system on $n$ elements assigns to each element a cyclic order of the other $n-1$ elements. A four-element subset is non-planar if its induced rotation system cannot be realized by a crossing-free drawing of $K_4$. As a combinatorial strengthening of Hill's conjecture on the crossing number of the complete graph, Archdeacon conjectured that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $H(n)=\frac{1}{4} \lfloor\frac {n}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor \lfloor\frac{n-3}{2}\rfloor$ non-planar four-element subsets. We computationally verify Archdeacon's conjecture for $n\leq 10$ and show that every extremal rotation system in these orders is realizable by a simple drawing. With computer assistance, we prove that every rotation system on $n$ elements has at least $(8/9 - o(1)) H(n)$ non-planar four-element subsets. We also present a proof by hand for a weaker lower bound of $(2/3-o(1)) H(n)$. Finally, extending recent work of Felsner on antipodal pairs in drawings, we show that Archdeacon's conjecture holds for antipodally shellable rotation systems.

cs.CG

The Hyperbolic Surface Distance, Diameter, and Dirichlet Problems

Despite the prominence of hyperbolic surfaces in mathematics, basic algorithmic questions about them, even computing the distance between two points, have remained open, leaving many features of these surfaces inaccessible. The classical machinery assumes a polyhedral structure absent on a smooth surface. We remove these obstacles. We begin with an efficient $O(g^2)$ algorithm for the distance between two points, where $g$ is the genus of the surface. Building on it, we obtain an $O(g^2 \log g)$ method for answering distance queries from a fixed source and, as a consequence, for recentering a Dirichlet domain around an arbitrary point. This understanding of distances on the surface then lets us approximate the diameter to within any $\eps$ in time $O(g^3 \log g / \eps^2)$. We further show that the diameter, a single real number encoding a great deal about the surface, is exactly computable. Its hyperbolic cosine is an algebraic number over the field encoding the coefficients of the hyperbolic isometries defining the surface.

cs.CG