SearcharxivSearch

arXiv · 2510.22193

(Approximate) Matrix Multiplication via Convolutions

Abstract

We study the capability of the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to accelerate exact and approximate matrix multiplication without using Strassen-like divide-and-conquer. We present a simple exact algorithm running in $O(n^{2.89})$ time, which only sums a few convolutions (FFTs) in $\mathbb{Z}_{m}^{k}$, building on the work of Cohn, Kleinberg, Szegedy and Umans (2005). As a corollary, combining this algorithm with linear sketching breaks the longstanding linear speed-accuracy tradeoff for "combinatorial" approximate matrix multiplication (AMM, Pagh'13, Sarlos'06, Clarkson-Woodruff'13), achieving error $\frac{1}{r^{1.1}}\left\lVert \mathbf{A} \right\rVert_{F}^{2}\left\lVert \mathbf{B}\right\rVert_{F}^{2}$ in $O(rn^{2})$ time, using nothing but FFTs. Motivated by the rich literature for approximating polynomials, our main contribution in this paper is extending the group-theoretic framework of Cohn and Umans (2003) to approximate matrix multiplication (AMM). Specifically, we introduce and study an approximate notion of the Triple Product Property, which in the abelian case is equivalent to finding a Sumset which minimizes (multi-)intersections with an arithmetic progression. We prove tight bounds on this quantity for abelian groups (yielding a simple and practical AMM algorithm via polynomial multiplication), and establish a weaker lower bound for non-abelian groups, extending a lemma of Gowers. Finally, we propose a concrete approach that uses low-degree approximation of multi-variate polynomials for AMM, which we believe will lead to practical, non-asymptotic AMM algorithms in real-world applications, most notably LLM inference.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yahel Uffenheimer, Omri Weinstein. 2025-10-25. (Approximate) Matrix Multiplication via Convolutions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22193

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS