BBOPlace-Bench: Benchmarking Black-Box Optimization for Chip Placement

Abstract

Chip placement is a vital stage in modern chip design, and black-box optimization (BBO) has been applied to it for decades. Early BBO efforts, however, were limited by immature problem formulations and inefficient algorithm designs, leading to worse efficiency, quality, and scalability than mainstream analytical methods. Recent advances in BBO have shown strong potential, but a unified, BBO-specific benchmark for thoroughly assessing various problem formulations and BBO algorithms is lacking. To fill this gap, we propose BBOPlace-Bench, the first benchmark tailored for evaluating and developing BBO algorithms for chip placement. It integrates three BBO problem formulations and offers a modular, flexible framework that enables users to seamlessly implement, test, and compare their own algorithms. It aggregates representative modern chip cases and standardizes their formats, providing uniform and comprehensive information to support BBO optimization. Moreover, it integrates representative BBO algorithm families, including simulated annealing, population-based search (including GA, CMA-ES, and PSO), and Bayesian optimization, and systematically evaluates their performance across different problem formulations using key chip-placement metrics. We position these experiments primarily as illustrative case studies under a shared evaluation protocol, including common benchmark instances, metric definitions, evaluation pipeline, and search budgets. Under this protocol, some BBO configurations (e.g., GA under the mask-guided optimization formulation) are competitive with representative analytical and reinforcement learning baselines. BBOPlace-Bench not only facilitates the development of efficient BBO-driven solutions for chip placement but also broadens the practical application scenarios urgently needed by the BBO community.